A President may persuade members of their own party to vote for a particular bill by B, denying campaign funds to members who oppose the bill.
The President is often thought to be the leader of whatever party they are a member of, giving them a tremendous amount of power when it comes to the raising of money as they are the top draw.
So, a President can use campaign funding as a stick and a carrot to get members of Congress to vote a particular way.
If the member in Congress is in the opposition, they are out of luck.
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
I believe the answer is The bank secrecy Act.
Prior to this act, the government cannot (under any circumstances) force banks to Record information about any transactions made by certain organizations/individuals.
This act force the banks to made the record if the amount surpasses $10,000 in order to prevent money laundering.
Answer: B
Explanation: Now promise me that you will give me Brainllest