Tom refused to accept Sam's input and change his attitude. Interestingly, the input provided by Sam further strengthened Tom's initial attitude. This is an example of a: <u>contrast effect</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
A contrast effect is the term used in psychology to explain the aggravation or decline, cognition or related performance as a result of consecutive or simultaneous exposure to a stimulus of lesser or greater value in the same dimension.
The type of contrast depends upon the how the participant considers a situation. There are two types of contrast effect. They are
i) Positive contrast effect
ii) Negative contrast effect
In the above scenario, Tom and Sam were discussing about the tax rates. Conflict arises between them when Sam objects Tom’s view on tax rates. Tom got aggravated and strengthened his attitude.
Answer:
Assurance
Explanation:
The assurance function of public health refers to implementing a systematic and disciplined approach in order to obtain a certain health-related public goals,.
To achieve this, Public health institutions will develop a through annual planning in order to develop the most cost-efficient program and work together with other administrations to ensure that their programs are well enforced.
Answer:
First Amendment rights of free speech and press, peaceful assembly, and to petition the government
Explanation:
The Triple Alliance, also known as the Central Powers, consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option. The other choices are incorrect and can be neglected. I hope that this is the answer that has come to your help.
Answer:
Logrolling.
Explanation:
This is simply defined to be an act of favour trading that is been pushed by a certain number of legislators in a country or a political situation without outrightly putting the task payers into total consideration; this selfishly for the legislators and politicians political gains only. In some cases, it can be also seen that two parties could easily pledge their mutual support, so as making the said bills attain a simple majority. Example is been seen in a vote that was carried out on behalf of a tariff which may be traded by a certain congressman for a vote from another congressman on behalf of an oil allocation to ensure that both acts will gain a majority.
