Based on the historical account, the person that received the right to land grants in Texas as a result of the State Colonization Law of 1825 is Stephen F. Austin.
- This is evident in the fact that Stephen F. Austin got the recognition of the empresario grant from the then independent state of Mexico.
- He is also known to have taken about 300 families to settle in Texas.
- Though, Stephen Austin's father' Moses Austin had received the land grant to settle in Texas in 1820.
However, it was until after the State Colonization Law of 1825, that Stephen Austin received the land grant and finally settle there along with some other Anglo families.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option D. "Stephen F. Austin."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20065024
They introduced the Proclamation of 1763.
Explanation:
- Before the French and Indian wars, the French controlled the fur trade from their bases in Canada. French merchants traded with the Native Americans in the Ohio and Mississippi valleys, even as far as the Missouri River. The French did not settle in these areas but focused on establishing trading posts.
- After the French and Indian wars, the British took over the fur trade from the French. Native American tribes were threatened by the western movement of the American colonists. The Ohio Valley Indians fought the French during the French and Indian Wars to block the colonists' Western movements.
- The Western colonist movement angered the tribes of the Ohio Valley. The settlers threatened to disrupt and destroy the lucrative fur trade now benefiting England, helping to repay debts incurred during the French and Indian wars. The western settlement had to be stopped in order to preserve peace and the fur trade with the Indians.
- The proclamation of 1763 made it illegal for any settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains.
Learn more on Proclamation of 1763 on
brainly.com/question/757841
brainly.com/question/1286896
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
The rhetoric technique that Martin Luther King uses repeatedly in the above text is the use of similes and the use of figurative language.
Explanation:
Similes are speech techniques that use the comparison of two variables interestingly.
Figurative language is the use of a word to mean differently to its custom meaning.
<em>Martin Luther King uses Socrates and Jesus figuratively to explain his ideas, since, they are not part of his topic, but have similar traits as the situation he is trying to explain, this is an example of figurative language in the above excerpt.</em>
Martin Luther in this excerpt uses similes multiple times to bring out his points.
Some of the instances where he uses similes are;
- Isn't this like condemning Socrates because his unswerving commitment to truth and his philosophical inquiries
- Isn't this like condemning Jesus because his unique God consciousness and never ceasing devotion to God's will precipitated the evil act of crucifixion?
This questions help him explain his point, it also makes the people understand his point out of the comparison of what they know to what they do not know.
