1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gala2k [10]
1 year ago
10

What is the external Conflict (character vs nature) in the story "The scarlet Ibis"

History
1 answer:
nalin [4]1 year ago
6 0

The external Conflict (character vs nature) in the story "The Scarlet Ibis" is the struggle between opposing forces outside of one's self.

"The Scarlet Ibis" is a brief story written via James Hurst. It became first posted in the Atlantic monthly in July 1960 and received the "Atlantic First" award. The tale has grown to be a convention of American literature and has been regularly republished in high school anthologies and different collections.

'The Scarlet Ibis,' a short tale with the aid of James Hurst that was published in 1960, is a sad story of a child born with a serious scientific situation who overcomes some of his challenges handiest to be run to demise by way of his well-meaning but self-absorbed older brother.

The Scarlet Ibis symbolizes Doodle in his warfare to speak and interact with the relaxation of society with his disabilities. The death and the color of the Scarlet Ibis represent Doodle and the way he becomes alone similar to the chicken who became by himself and some distance from home.

Learn more about The Scarlet Ibis here brainly.com/question/9231802

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
George Washington's main objective as president
My name is Ann [436]
There is a couple of goals he set in mind.  
<span>1: maintain his power and get reelected
2: keep peace between the northern and southern states
3: establish respect for the office of the presidency
4: set up a court similar to that of European monarchs</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What impact did the russian revolution have on the united states?
Kipish [7]
<span>Even before the the Russian Revolution, or W.W. 1, Lenin and the Bolsheviks were distinguished from all other tendencies in the international socialist and labor movement by their concern with the problems of oppressed nations and national minorities, and affirmative support of their struggles for freedom, independence and the right of self-determination. The Bolsheviks gave this support to all “people without equal rights” sincerely and earnestly, but there was nothing “philanthropic” about it. They also recognized the great revolutionary potential in the situation of oppressed peoples and nations, and saw them as important allies of the international working class in the revolutionary struggle against capitalism.

After November 1917 this new doctrine—with special emphasis on the Negroes—began to be transmitted to the American communist movement with the authority of the Russian Revolution behind it. The Russians in the Comintern started on the American communists with the harsh, insistent demand that they shake off their own unspoken prejudices, pay attention to the special problems and grievances of the American Negroes, go to work among them, and champion their cause in the white community.

It took time for the Americans, raised in a different tradition, to assimilate the new Leninist doctrine. But the Russians followed up year after year, piling up the arguments and increasing the pressure on the American communists until they finally learned and changed, and went to work in earnest. And the change in the attitude of the American communists, gradually effected in the ’20s, was to exert a profound influence in far wider circles in the later years.

By the 1930's, Communist Party influence and action were not restricted to the issue of “civil rights” in general. They also operated powerfully to reshape the labor movement and help the Black workers gain a place in it which had previously been denied. The Black workers themselves, who had done their share in the great struggles to create the new unions, were pressing their own claims more aggressively than ever before. But they needed help, they needed allies. The Communist Party militants stepped into this role at the critical point in the formative days of the new unions. The policy and agitation of the Communist Party at that time did more, 10 times over, than any other to help the Black workers to rise to a new status of at least semi-citizenship in the new labour movement created in the ’30s under the banner of the CIO.
Please mark my answer as the brainliest.

</span>
8 0
4 years ago
Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooof
Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooof indeed

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pretty PLEASE help: How is one of the play's central conflicts over the fate of Rome resolved? A. Brutus and Cassius are defeate
notsponge [240]
A. Brutus and Cassius are defeated at Philippi, making Antony and Octavius the leaders of Rome.

The final act ends up with Cassius and Brutus fighting against Antony and Octavius. Both Cassius and Brutus end up dying and that solidifies that Antony and Octavius will rule, although the play does hint at potential friction between the two remaining leaders.
8 0
3 years ago
Describe one key event that happened in the European Theater of World War II, after the US joined the war.
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

please give me brainlest star please

Explanation:

Victory in the European Theater

Victory in the European Theater

Despite the fact that a Japanese attack in the Pacific was the tripwire for America’s entrance into the war, Roosevelt had been concerned about Great Britain since the beginning of the Battle of Britain. Roosevelt viewed Germany as the greater threat to freedom. Hence, he leaned towards a “Europe First” strategy, even before the United States became an active belligerent. That meant that the United States would concentrate the majority of its resources and energies in achieving a victory over Germany first and then focus on defeating Japan. Within Europe, Churchill and Roosevelt were committed to saving Britain and acted with this goal in mind, often ignoring the needs of the Soviet Union. As Roosevelt imagined an “empire-free” postwar world, in keeping with the goals of the Atlantic Charter, he could also envision the United States becoming the preeminent world power economically, politically, and militarily. (2)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What Federalist do at the end of their term in order to retain control of the Judiciary
    7·1 answer
  • Which changes occurred during the rule of Abbasids? Select all that apply. Constantinople became the new empire’s capital. Arab
    11·2 answers
  • To sell state-run firms to individuals is to
    6·1 answer
  • The charts show coal and steel production during China’s first Five-Year Plan.
    7·1 answer
  • What contributed to changing european views of asians and africans in the nineteenth century?
    14·1 answer
  • Who startwd the texas massacre​
    11·1 answer
  • How do you think the immigrant girl feels about being asked how to wash stairs? Check all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • When the equilibrium is offset by any
    10·1 answer
  • Which pair of processess do scientists think move Earth's lithospheric plates?
    10·2 answers
  • Non-examples of International Trade?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!