Answer:
point-of-purchase advertising.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Brad is contacting each of his grocery and convenience accounts with an opportunity to install an end-of-aisle display with graphics of the Super Bowl teams and a display of several varieties of chips.
Hence, this is known as point-of-purchase advertising, a type of trade-oriented promotion.
A point of purchase advertising can be defined as a marketing strategy used by retailers, which typically involves the placement of end user goods e.g graphics of the Super Bowl teams strategically placed in a supermarket aisle for retail customers.
Answer: A balanced economy generally has neutral economic stance.
Explanation:
A balanced economy generally has neutral economic stance. This means a balanced economy is one in which the finance of the economy I.e both the imports and exports are in equal proportion.
Answer:
$5,500
Explanation:
When a company makes sales on account, debit accounts receivable and credit sales. Based on assessment, some or all of the receivables may be uncollectible.
To account for this, debit bad debit expense and credit allowance for doubtful debt. Should the debt become uncollectible (i.e go bad), debit allowance for doubtful debt and credit accounts receivable.
Adjustments to allowance required
= $15,000 - $9,500
= $5,500
The entries to be posted are
Debit Bad debt $5,500
Credit Allowance for Doubtful debt $5,500
Answer:
Correct answer is False for economic decision making, when the inputs and outputs are fixed, the criterion to use is minimize the input
Since, both input and output are fixed, the input can’t be decreased. Each of them has to be fixed in directive to vary the association among them. (It can be fixed contribution, or fixed production or neither one of them is fixed)
Answer:
Answer for the question
Some observers had argued that Uber’s greatest problem was not any of its scandals, but its CEO Travis Kalanick. Now that Kalanick no longer serves that role, how much better off is Uber really? Where do you come down? Do you think Kalanick’s reduced profile will turn the tide for Uber? Or is Kalanick’s drive and competitiveness necessary to Uber’s continued success, regardless of the title he holds? If you were on the board, what would you recommend? And why?
Is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
