Not necessarily. Assuming you are talking about the American Civil War, one of the only things that kept the south from capturing Washington D.C. was a note being intercepted and southern plans being known by the north.
Answer:
Only one in two Americans oil drilled back then
Explanation:
One-in-two Americans are ready to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to lessen the country’s dependence on foreign oil, but they’re not nearly so willing to drive 55.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 50% of Adults believe the United States should produce more domestic oil by allowing drilling in the ANWR, an issue that Congress has debated for years. Thirty-five percent (35%) oppose drilling in the refuge, while 14% are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
The radioactive ANYTHING industry. From radium injected hair gel, clock dials, and even water.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>Reject the null, there is a difference</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>As per the question, if the given conclusion were incorrect then the error that the researcher has made was rejecting the null hypothesis as it states that there is a difference in characteristics of a mentioned population.</em>
<em>In statistics, the null hypothesis is described as one of the distinct types of hypotheses that is being used in statistics and states that is majorly no difference between the characteristics of a mentioned population or any process that involves data gathering or generating</em>
