I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:Self-interest study
Explanation:
It is the case of self-interest study where the concerned party conducts the research for their personal benefits to promote their brands.
This research has nothing to do the public domain as it is just a marketing strategy to gain more consumers and establish an appealing image in consumers.Since it is a beverage company therefore they are researching for performance of subject after drinking energy drink.
Answer:
The Strategic politician hypothesis
Explanation:
Strategic politician hypothesis involves politicians knowing when to make certain moves concerning their political ambitions.
President Barack Obama's popularity sagging and a struggling economy, many quality Democratic candidates decided not to run in the 2014 elections because they felt it wasn’t the right time to do so in order to support their fellow Democrats in order not to lose power to the opposition.
Answer:
Assuming that association proves causation.
Explanation:
Did the assignment.
