The best answer in that set would seem to be "compromise." I'm not sure I'd use exactly that term, but it's the best term from the set of answers given. Count Camillo di Cavour was prime minister of the Kingdom of Sardinia, serving under King Victor Emmanuel II. This was a time in history (in the 19th century) when prime ministers were starting to exercise more control of policy than the kings themselves. It was also a time of something that came to be known a "Realpolitik" (a German term), or "realistic politics." So I'd say Cavour was a political realist who chose paths of action that would benefit his overall aims, whether or not they fit some specific ideology or master plan. I suppose "compromise" would be another way of saying that, but I'd prefer to say he practiced political realism.
A lodeing dock where the lodes the raw materials either for trade or for resorce payment
Answer:
because they where walking on the earth?
I believe the answer is: <span>They used steel plows and other new forms of technology.
Prior to this invention, the farmers only rely on the buffalo's step or manual hooes to process the field and left the part where the soil composition is too hard to process. This of course resulted in lower amount of production that the farmers obtain per area of their farms.</span>
The choice to enable the general population of Kansas to vote whether their new state would be slave or free.
This meagerly populated domain pulled in all way of cross-fringe looters from the two sides of the verbal confrontation, resolved to threaten voters and get the outcomes pronounced invalid.
There was horrible slaughter, and demonstrate couldn't help suspecting that the bondage level headed discussion could never be settled, with the exception of through battle. The slave-question that caused the new Compromise of 1850 was the confirmation of California as free soil.