Answer:
William wants to have things organized in England because he stays in France. England is divided into shires. Under control by the reeve, who is like the sheriff of the shire. SHIRE+REEVE=sheriff. A reeve is an administrator of a shire. So WILLIAM comes in and says that all of England is his territory so he gives the land to all the people that fought with him. So the feudal system returns. So Norman nobles were in charge. If you divide it up and you promised people certain things, you need an INVENTORY.
-Domesday Book-inventory of all the property in England. So William can keep track of what he gave who and what their taxes are. Wants to know what he can expect back if he gives people the land.
-William spent most of his time in France and he spoke French, and all his nobles spoke French so England is really francofied now. The kings of England say they are as French as English. The 100 years war finally gets the English out of France. So it took a long time for English kings to admit that they couldn't have France. When they go back and look at dynasties in England, this is really where they start: William the Conqueror.
-In England, there were seven dynasties but usually because a name dies out rather then war. He thinks as highly of Normandy as England. Spent most of his time in Normandy. They end up getting more French territory so people think they can be the kings of France too. NOT TRUE.
I am not sure what exactly you want to receive as an answer but Ill give 2 examples.
After the rise of the Third Reich Jewish people were forced to migrate from Germany to neighboring countries and a lot of them in fact fled to United States including the famous scientist Albert Einstein.
The other example is the forced migration of Native Americans during the settlement and colonization by the American Colonies as they were trying to go farther down the continent.
The South opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it would have prevented any new territories from having slavery in them.
In 1846, Congressman David Wilmot of Pennsylvania introduced the proviso as an amendment to an appropriations bill in connection with the peace treaty being negotiated with Mexico. His amendment stipulated that any territory gained from Mexico would be free, not allowing slavery. The specific language of the proviso went like this:
<span><em>Provided, That, as an express and fundamental condition to the acquisition of any territory from the Republic of Mexico by the United States, by virtue of any treaty which may be negotiated between them, and to the use by the Executive of the moneys herein appropriated, neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory, except for crime, whereof the party shall first be duly convicted</em>.
</span>
Wilmot's amendment passed in the House of Representatives, but was unable to get approval in the Senate. The high-intensity debate over slavery and the expansion of slavery was evidenced by how things went with the "Wilmot Proviso."
