Pelosi's husband dumps Nvidia stock as House eyes chip bill

1 answer:

3 0

The conclusion of the excerpt is that the there is strong evidence that suggests that lawmakers are taking advantage of insider information with respect to trading. The narrator indirectly cited The Stock Act.

An initial law known as the STOCK Act forbids members of Congress and congressional staff from utilizing confidential information obtained from their public offices for personal gain or for any other reason.

A law passed by Congress in 2012 called the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act aims to halt insider trading. On April 4, 2012, President Barack Obama enacted it into law.

<h3>What is insider trading?</h3>

Undertaking financial investments based on information that is unknown to others is known as insider trading, regardless of whether it is related to fraud or a breach of fiduciary duty.

Because these actions have a negative effect on other individuals, they are considered unethical.

<h3>How does insider trading hurt others?</h3>

Insider trading damages public trust in the securities markets, according to one rationale typically stated by regulators and observers.

People will be less eager to invest if they believe that insiders would profit at their cost on a frequent basis.

This goes to the heart of the issues and why the actions reported are being decried.

Learn more about ethical principles:
brainly.com/question/24606527
#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Oliver is writing an essay that supports banning vending machines with candy and soft drinks in schools. Which

lukranit [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

it's contradicting what he believes in

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

These words sank deep into my heart, stirred up sentiments within that lay slumbering, and called into existence an entirely new

kaheart [24]

Answer:

B. It shows that Douglass's new awareness of how owners maintain control over slaves allows him to better understand how to improve his situation.

Explanation:

Frederick Douglass was an American African man born into slavery. He later learned to read and write, later gaining his freedom and became a huge abolitionist working for the freedom and rights of his fellow black people. His memoir "Narrative of The life of Frederick Douglass" became one of the foremost important documentation of a slave and in general, the slavery system.

The given excerpt is from when Douglass was a slave in the household of the Aulds. There, Mrs. Sophia Auld being unfamiliar with having a slave was surprisingly good to him. She even taught him how to read and learn the alphabet, Douglass wrote "<em>she very kindly commenced to teach me the A, B, C. After I had learned this, she assisted me in learning to spell words of three or four letters"</em>. But then her husband came to know about it and prevented her from continuing this education, "<em>telling her, among other things, that it was unlawful, as well as unsafe, to teach a slave to read.</em>"

This is when Douglass realized that education is what a slave needs to get equal with the white masters, admitting that his "<em>youthful understanding had struggled, but struggled in vain</em>". But Mr. Auld's prevention of his education made him more aware of the slave owners' authority over their slaves and it was this moment that he understood what he needed to improve his situation.

5 0

4 years ago

This passage about surveillance under the patriot act was written by the . they are most concerned about . the author of this do

kaheart [24]

The US Patriot Act was put together by George Bush with the aim of preventing terrorism attacks by surveillance of people.

<h3>What is the Patriot Act?</h3>

This refers to the government act that was put in place during the administration of Bush that was aimed at preventing terrorism by the infringement of the rights of people through surveillance.

Hence, we can see that because your question was incomplete, there was a general overview of what the Patriot Act was and how it was not popular because of the infringement of privacy.