Answer:
d. a deductive argument
Explanation:
Deductive argument is one that is conveyed as the arguer to be seductively valid, and conclusions bare drawn from this argument.
So the argument here is that inner city household interviews are difficult and expensive.
Based on this argument, the fact that we are carrying out substantial inner city household interviews now will mean that they will be expensive.
The truth of the conclusion is dependent on the validity of the first argument.
<span>The first Job has a 100% chance for Mark to earn $50,000.
While the second Job Has a possible 50% chance for Mark to earn $20,000 and another possible 50% chance for him to earn $80,000 ($20,000 + $60,000)
If mark is risk neutral (Meaning that he is insensitive as regards to risk taking) and he wants to maximize his expected utility then Mark will go for the 100% chance of earning $50,000.</span>
Hi there
The answer is
an adjustment will probably be required as supplies are used.
Good luck!
Answer:
Option E, is correct as effective interest $ 120,839
Explanation:
The coupon interest payable semi-annually is computed thus:
Semi-annual coupon =13%/2*$2000000
=$130,000
However the bond was issued at premium, using effective interest the first interest payment is calculated on the actual issue value of the bond of $2,197,080 using the market rate of interest
effective interest=11%/2*$2,197,080
=$ 120,839.40
Hence,the interest expense based on effective interest is $120,839 rounded to the nearest whole number
Option D is wrong because the effective interest is a semi-annual interest not an annual one.
