Answer:
A - Compulsory education.
Explanation:
Compulsory education, as it's name suggests, refers to the requirement of all people to be educated by the government. Depending the country and type of society, what is perceived as education may change (could be homeschooling or registered schooling). It's a double movement for parents given that they are to see that their children receive instruction and the government has to provide the opportunities.
Answer:
b.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that an evolutionary psychology explanation for this would be that symmetry is a sign of health and that a potential mates have good genes. This is because in the theory of evolution only the aspects that increase chances of reproduction are the ones that get passed down from generation to generation. Therefore increasing the attractiveness of a mate would be an evolutionary explanation.
The specialization is process that has started to become more dominant since the globalization took over the global market. It is basically a production of one of only few goods for which the country has the best conditions to produce them. The majority of those goods are exported, while the goods that are needed and not produced are imported. In this case, South Africa is the largest producer of electricity in the region, and it is one of the sectors in which it has been specializing. This enables the surrounding countries to be able to produce other goods and not worry about the production of electricity, as their neighbor is able to supply them with it, while they supply South Africa with the goods that they produce.
I think the answer is 1). External environmental cues
Answer:
c) symbolic interactionist
Explanation:
This micro level theory is attributed to George Herbert Mead though the name, symbolic interaction is the, was coined by George's student, Herbert Blumer. The theory seeks to explain people's relationships within a society and how they interpret what happens around them. In the question above, Carol has hypothesized the apparent contradiction in goals of women having to combine work and being wives, as a result of her past experiences with women who may have experienced these difficulties under same situation.