One relates to the Anatta (Anatman) doctrine, that is ignorance or misconceptions about "Self", when in reality there is only non-Self according to Buddhism. The second relates to Anicca doctrine, that is ignorance or misconceptions about "permanence", when the nature of reality is impermanence.
Answer:
an attitude
Explanation:
Attitude: In psychology, the term "attitude" is described as a particular set of an individual's behaviors, emotions, and beliefs with respect to a specific event, object, thing, or person. It is generally considered as a consequence of upbringing or experience and can also possess an important influence on an individual's behavior. It is an attitude that tends to characterize a person and is acquired through a person's experience with different things.
In the question above, the given statement is referred to as an attitude.
Based on comparative advantage and the situation described above, <u>the country that would benefit is Canada, while the country would be at a disadvantage in the United States.</u>
<h3>What is Comparative Advantage?</h3>
Comparative Advantage is the economic term used to describe the economy's ability of a company or country to manufacture a specific commodity or service at a cheaper opportunity cost than its trading partners.
Therefore, currently, Canada is known to have many industries in the oil, such as petroleum and natural gas. Therefore, Canada can quickly produce and trade oil at cheaper production costs with the United States.
However, United States' top industry does not include auto part production; therefore, to trade auto parts with Canada would be expensive to the United States.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Canada would benefit, while the United States would be at a disadvantage.
Learn more about Comparative Advantage here: brainly.com/question/7045530
