Answer:
Magellan got killed in Mactan, Philippines.
Explanation:
<span>False. Austria’s
economy is mainly involved with the service sector that provides food and
luxury commodities, as well as mechanical engineering, steel construction,
chemicals, and vehicle manufacturing. The country is actually a highly
developed industrialized area and these are their specialties. But for the past
years, Austria is witnessing a strong trend towards organic farming. They have
an 11.9% overall shares on organic farms among other EU Member States. It is
still a developing process in which developing enterprises dedicate this branch
of agriculture to farming and livestock. </span>
The price of the product would be the factor that affects demand.
- Increment in the taxation of the smoking prices, this would lead to higher expenses for everybody, there may be substantial consequences for many of the population has resulted in even minor decreases throughout the consumption of the cigarette.
- Those individuals whose smoking has been decreasing since taxation is increasing and discourages non-smokers from either the beginning as well as encourages established people to stop such tobaccos as well as cigarettes smoking.
Thus the answer above is correct.
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/17353256
Fast growing cities rarely had sewage systems which increased disease. Also many factories let out pollutants in the air. They also had few safety regulations and employed children, usually orphans, leading to many accidental deaths due to machinery and fires.
<span>In the Elstad case the court ruled that
the suspect’s statement that put him in the act, or admitted guilt was unsolicited. He was taken to the station and Maranda
before he gave a second statement.
During the questioning of Seibert, five days after the act, the officer
questioned her for 30 to 40 minutes obtaining a confession that caused a death
in the fire of her trailer. After taking
a 20 minute break the officer came back, read the Maranda and obtained a signed
waiver. Then got another statement. The
District Court suppressed the prewarning statement but admitted the post
warning one, and Seibert was convicted of second-degree murder. The Missouri
Court of Appeals affirmed, finding the case indistinguishable from Oregon
v. Elstad,
in which this Court held that a suspect's
unwarned inculpatory statement made during a brief exchange at his house did
not make a later, fully warned inculpatory statement inadmissible. In
reversing, the State Supreme Court held that, because the interrogation was
nearly continuous, the second statement, which was clearly the product of the
invalid first statement, should be suppressed; and distinguished Elstad
on the ground that the warnings had not intentionally been withheld</span>
