Answer:
The correct option is C: Grayson-Himes Pay for Performance Act
Explanation:
The bill was passed in 2009 was aimed at prohibiting some compensation to employees at some organization that were under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. This was done to help these financial institutions. It was an amendment to the executive compensation provisions of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.
Answer:
change in demand and change in quantity demanded have two pretty different meanings.
Explanation:
change in demand is meaning there is a change it what people may need at the moment but change in quantity demanded is referring to how much they may need of a certain thing
Answer:
they are :
we can make close relations with the neighbour countries and gain benefits. We can export and import goods from neighbouring countries so that our economy increases. we can have help with the neighbouring countries if we are in a conflict with some other countries.
Answer:
Option A
All were focused on republicanism and social uniformity.
Explanation:
- They spread broadly the goals of progressivism, republicanism, the topple of nobilities, lords and built up temples.
- They stressed the widespread standards of the Enlightenment, for example, the uniformity everything being equal, including equivalent equity under law by uninvolved courts rather than specific equity passed on at the impulse of a neighborhood honorable.
- They demonstrated that the cutting edge thought of insurgency, of beginning crisp with a profoundly new government, could really work by and by. Progressive mindsets were conceived and keep on thriving to the present day
Answer:
<em>Research </em>is a <em>process of generating new knowledge about a specific subject by acquiring new information, analyzing it and putting it into the framework of existing knowledge in order to make new conclusions.
</em>
Let us take as an <u>example </u>the salient issue of electronic cigarettes. Being on the market in many countries for several years now, e-cigarettes have both their supporters and opposers. Some people <u>claim</u> that e-cigarettes is a good alternative to smoking tobacco and while they can be harmful they are less harmful than tobacco. Some people share an <u>opinion</u> that e-cigarettes are dangerous and should be banned.
Only <u>research </u>can educate both of these opinions with validated scientific outcomes. That is why so many institutions are currently running extensive research on the impact of e-cigarettes on human health. Until robust scientific data is collected, which takes a lot of time with subjects that are expected to have a long-term effect on human health, ideas in favor or against will prevail the agenda on this subject. Moreover, the lack of research can result in fear mongering <u>ideas</u> about e-cigarettes, or opposite to that, fashion to use e-cigarettes among people who were not smoking tobacco before.
