Explanation:
1. I <u>agree </u>with the Sitting Bull's quote. It makes me feel a bit upset, Sitting Bull conveyed great emotion within the 8 sentence that are there.
2. I do <u>not </u>think western settlers could have coexisted with tribes they encountered due to how persistent Sitting Bull was for fighting for the Native American's freedom from the Western Settlers.
3. I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have been put on reservations. The Native Americans were there before the Western Settlers were, this is their land.
4. No, I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have adapted to settler ways. Native Americans have their own culture which the settlers should not intervene with.
5. The settlers and federal government was <u>not</u> within their rights to conquer Native Americans and take their homelands. The Native Americans have their own rights just as much the settlers did. The homelands were where they lived. They were not above the Native Americans.
Answer:
Trading good was apart of the Colombian. Stuff like trading horses, sugar plants, Tabaco but not only goods it also came with disease
The correct answer is D; People that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement.
Further Explanation:
When a person is arrested, no matter the age, they must be read their Miranda rights. This informs the person being arrested that they have the right to remain silent and that they can have an attorney. If the person being arrested is not read their Miranda rights, the charges can be dismissed in a trial.
Any type of confession that is given without the rights being read can void that confession in a court of law. The Supreme Court ruled in this case in 1966.
Learn more about Miranda Rights at brainly.com/question/3587626
#LearnwithBrainly
Sugar, slaves, spices, tobacco, tea, etc.
Answer:
Malaysia is often held up as a model nation that blends modern secular institutions with a tolerant brand of Islam. Sharia, or Islamic law, is followed but in the context of a constitutional framework. A recent decision, however, by Malaysia’s high court refusing to recognize a Muslim woman’s conversion to Christianity has called into question the country’s freedom of religion and multi-faith identity. Similar cases in Afghanistan, Egypt, and Jordan also have aroused concern among Western-based rights groups about Islam’s compatibility with democracy.
