1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ZanzabumX [31]
1 year ago
13

A monarchy could also be considered a dictatorship if which of the following also occurred?

History
1 answer:
Katyanochek1 [597]1 year ago
8 0

A monarchy could also be considered a dictatorship then the monarch was absolute and authoritarian.

A monarchy or crown is a reign that is passed down from one generation to the next, whereas a dictatorship is an office that has been obtained via force. But when the monarch turned into a dictatorship, he became the only figurehead in the country. All authority is vested in him. He become absolute and authoritarian.

In such nations, either a monarchy (monarchy) or a dictatorship (dictatorship) are in place, either of which is in charge of the entire nation. Although there are certain exceptions to this rule in a number of nations, both of these regimes are thought to violate citizens' rights. Under these regimes, there is no constitutionally elected government.

To learn more about monarchy here

brainly.com/question/10740346

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Question 5 (ID=2471422)
liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Suppose your ancestors came from the highlands of western England and settled in the Appalachian Mountains of present-day West V
gavmur [86]
Suppose your ancestors came from the Highlands of Western England and settled in the Appalachian Mountains of present-day West Virginia. Among the waves of immigrants from England your ancestors were the D) Puritans. 
4 0
3 years ago
What three parts do both the U.S. Constitution and the Florida Constitution include?
nadezda [96]

Answer:

The second line of b

Explanation:

im smart like that

3 0
3 years ago
Y'all help me!!!<br> What were the advantages and the disadvantages of a charioteer's life? *
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

What is your life do you know what is ur lofe own

Explanation:

<h3>#CarryOnLearning</h3>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
NEED TO BE ANSWERED ASAP!!! WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF IT IS ANSWERED CORRECTLY
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

    The bombing of Hiroshima is and Nagaski is one of the most important events in history. Due to the fact that this affected and still is affecting human kind in Hiroshima and Nagaski. This all occurred because of Hiroshimas military and to the intend to make Japan surrender, in cause to end World War ll, they later decided to bomb Nagaski too. Over 200,000 died and thousands more were hurt in this tragity, but some surviors live to tell the story of this historic moment. Two of those surviors were Sunao Tsuboi and Shigemitsu Tanaka,  victims of the Hiroshima and Nagaski bombing on August 6, 1945 and August 9, of 1945.

   While Sunao Tsuboi was a 20 year old man heading to collage in Hiroshima  when this occurred, he was buned from head to toe he stated in NYTimes.com. He knew at this moment it would be the end for him, he layed next to a bridge. Until a classmate found and  approched him, he took him to a military hsopital where he got medical help. Till this day he is a retired worker, with a wife, children, and grandchildern. He has worked in office for the President and urged and stated this to the president to "work for world peace after he leave office".

  Shigemitsu Tanaka, was almost five when he witness this tragity. He discribed everything as white, windows braking, and a huge thunderclap in the sky. He was only playing under a tree when he took cover and tried to protect  himself. Later his mother suffered from repeated illnesses she worked as an elementary instructor. His father later died from cancer after 12 years of the bombing. Tanka said he "smelled burning flesh and moans", he also stated that Obama should clear nuclear wepons for good and hoped he would sit and listen to survivors.

   I would not defend nor support this tragity due to the fact that many innocent people were hurt or killed. In my opionion I think the United States should have used a diffrerent strategy to the point where no human being should have been hurt. Sometimes I do not understand why the United States didn't take percuation in this situation for the people. They always use the moto "For the good of the people" but did not lead up to this at the end. So in conculsion I DO NOT support or defend the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagaski.  

WRBSITES:https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html

Hope this somewhat helps you out, make sure to check for spelling errors many typos.

websites: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.htmlExplanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify and explain three Geographic advantages Romans benefited from on the Italian peninsula
    15·1 answer
  • Where were the Mamluks from? Syria Armenia Georgia Egypt
    14·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of the north atlantic treaty organization (nato)?
    13·1 answer
  • What does sitting at the table represent in Langston Hughes’s poem "I, Too"?
    13·1 answer
  • why might a sanction against the use of chemical or biological weapons be part of the Geneva Conventions?
    7·1 answer
  • During the Civil War, viny was the Battle of Atlanta Agnificant
    11·1 answer
  • Explain why it is wrong to refer to the side of the moon that always faces away from Earth as “the dark side of the moon?”
    6·1 answer
  • What kind of animal did Cleopatra use to kill herself? ...
    6·1 answer
  • How are the legislative and executive branches of the U.S. government different from each another?
    13·2 answers
  • Why would higher strikebreakers lead to violence?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!