Answer:
We have sufficient evidence to conclude at α = .05 that the husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s.
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypotheses testing procedure in the given scenario is
H0: Husband’s perception would be similar to the wife’s i.e. μh=μw
Ha: Husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s i.e. μh>μw
Level of significance: α=0.05
Test statistic: t=2.776
Critical region: t>t(0.05,9)=1.833
Conclusion: As the calculated value of t lies in critical region, so we reject our null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance. Thus, we have sufficient evidence to conclude at α = .05 that the husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s.
Yuhhh DISSKSNSLSKSKSKSKSSKSKSKNSSNSKENEKENEENDKDKDMDDJ i need points
Answer: The wingspan is 36 m.
Using a proportion to solve this, we write the scale factor as a ratio first: 19/38, since 19 is the size of the model's length and 38 is the real length. For the second ratio, we have 18 for the size of the model wingspan and x for the real wingspan:
19/38 = 18/x
Cross multiply:
19*x = 38*18
19x = 684
Answer: her call lasted for 26 minutes.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the number of minutes for which her call lasted.
Rachel purchased a prepaid phone card for $30. Long distance calls cost 6 cents a minute using this card. Converting 6 cents to dollars, it becomes 6/100 = $0.06
This means that the cost of x minutes of long distance call is
0.06 × x = $0.06x.
If the remaining credit on her card is $28.44, it means that
0.06x + 28.44 = 30
0.06x = 30 - 28.44
0.06x = 1.56
x = 1.56/0.06
x = 26
Answer:
The second one
Step-by-step explanation:
