1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mrrafil [7]
3 years ago
5

Heyyyyy peeeeppps help asap plzz :)

History
1 answer:
nata0808 [166]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1.     a. The Souths Strong military tradition.

2.     c. Produced more food crops.

3.     c. He failed to secure foreign support which illustrates that the Confederacy needed foreign aid to match Union resources.

4.     a. A larger army, but fewer exports

5.     b. The North's heavy industrialization provided an advantage

Sorry I didn't answer this earlier but I didn't see that until now.

You might be interested in
Explain MacMillan's conclusion that Wilson "remained a Southerner in some ways all his life." Describe how Wilson's background a
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

paki basa nalng .

Explanation:

On December 4, 1918, the George Washington sailed out of New York with the American delegation to the Peace Conference on board. Guns fired salutes, crowds along the waterfront cheered, tugboats hooted and Army planes and dirigibles circled overhead. Robert Lansing, the American secretary of state, released carrier pigeons with messages to his relatives about his deep hope for a lasting peace. The ship, a former German passenger liner, slid out past the Statue of Liberty to the Atlantic, where an escort of destroyers and battleships stood by to accompany it and its cargo of heavy expectations to Europe.

On board were the best available experts, combed out of the universities and the government; crates of reference materials and special studies; the French and Italian ambassadors to the United States; and Woodrow Wilson. No other American president had ever gone to Europe while in office. His opponents accused him of breaking the Constitution; even his supporters felt he might be unwise. Would he lose his great moral authority by getting down to the hurly-burly of negotiations? Wilson's own view was clear: the making of the peace was as important as the winning of the war. He owed it to the peoples of Europe, who were crying out for a better world. He owed it to the American servicemen. "It is now my duty," he told a pensive Congress just before he left, "to play my full part in making good what they gave their life's blood to obtain." A British diplomat was more cynical; Wilson, he said, was drawn to Paris "as a debutante is entranced by the prospect of her first ball."

Wilson expected, he wrote to his great friend Edward House, who was already in Europe, that he would stay only to arrange the main outlines of the peace settlements. It was not likely that he would remain for the formal Peace Conference with the enemy. He was wrong. The preliminary conference turned, without anyone's intending it, into the final one, and Wilson stayed for most of the crucial six months between January and June 1919. The question of whether or not he should have gone to Paris, which exercised so many of his contemporaries, now seems unimportant. From Franklin Roosevelt at Yalta to Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton at Camp David, American presidents have sat down to draw borders and hammer out peace agreements. Wilson had set the conditions for the armistices which ended the Great War. Why should he not make the peace as well?

Although he had not started out in 1912 as a foreign policy president, circumstances and his own progressive political principles had drawn him outward. Like many of his compatriots, he had come to see the Great War as a struggle between the forces of democracy, however imperfectly represented by Britain and France, and those of reaction and militarism, represented all too well by Germany and Austria-Hungary. Germany's sack of Belgium, its unrestricted submarine warfare and its audacity in attempting to entice Mexico into waging war on the United States had pushed Wilson and American public opinion toward the Allies. When Russia had a democratic revolution in February 1917, one of the last reservations that the Allies included an autocracy vanished. Although he had campaigned in 1916 on a platform of keeping the country neutral, Wilson brought the United States into the war in April 1917. He was convinced that he was doing the right thing. This was important to the son of a Presbyterian minister, who shared his father's deep religious conviction, if not his calling.

Wilson was born in Virginia in 1856, just before the Civil War. Although he remained a Southerner in some ways all his life in his insistence on honor and his paternalistic attitudes toward women and blacks he also accepted the war's outcome. Abraham Lincoln was one of his great heroes, along with Edmund Burke and William Gladstone. The young Wilson was at once highly idealistic and intensely ambitious. After four very happy years at Princeton and an unhappy stint as a lawyer, he found his first career in teaching and writing. By 1890 he was back at Princeton, a star member of the faculty. In 1902 he became its president, supported virtually unanimously by the trustees, faculty and students.

6 0
3 years ago
I-lockey is to puck as tennis is to​
yulyashka [42]

Answer:

play.....................

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Georgia was expected to participate in the system of mercantilism by A.) helping those most in need. B.) allowing merchants to r
kirza4 [7]

Answer:

Option: C. providing the home country with new markets.

Explanation:

With the help of James Edward Oglethorpe, Georgia founded in 1732. The colony named after King George II of England, who gave the Royal Charter for the colony to be settle. The settlers were debtors who given land to cultivate and to start a new life. The British interest was to increase trade and wealth for England. Mercantilism was a factor in the establishment of the colony of Georgia. The colonists produce agricultural products like Rice, indigo and tobacco, which desired in England.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain what an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory is, and give one or more examples?​
Effectus [21]
An anti Semitic conspiracy theory is a false claim that claims that Jews are behind something that they’re really not, or it blames Jews for something they’re not responsible for. For example, conspiracy theorists and anti semites claim that Jews own all the banks in the world, but that is false. They also have claimed a few hundred years ago that the Jews kill Christian children and use their blood on matzah, but that is also false. All this is done because anti semites are looking for a scapegoat to blame all their problems on, or they just hate Jews
6 0
3 years ago
What three actions did Italian scholars and writers encourage through their works?
Effectus [21]

Answer:The correct answers are as follows:

-humanism

-appreciation of the classics  

-curiosity

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Whom did kublai khan choose to fill important government positions?
    5·1 answer
  • The dust bowl ruined over __________ acres of farmland during this time period.
    5·2 answers
  • How did colonists react Declaration of Independence
    7·2 answers
  • Describe the decline of the first party system
    8·1 answer
  • Greece and Turkey were the first countries to receive aid under the Marshall Plan, partially to rebuild the countries but also t
    8·2 answers
  • A difference between Ellis island and angel island is that
    8·1 answer
  • Which best describes the influence of Isaac Newton's theory of universal gravitation?
    8·1 answer
  • The three steps governments follow to create public policy are
    10·2 answers
  • Explain how the Cherokee Removal act was unconstitutional.
    10·1 answer
  • How was Rome's location similar to that of Constantinople?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!