A few things that are similar are first they both trade things, there both powerful countries and yes there both lands in Africa ;). A few differences are the physical land, the culture government, the people, a lot of others things I'm sure if you put your mind to it you can figure out.
The new settlers of the Western Hemisphere initially used the indigenous people to be their farm slaves. most of the new slaves got too sick and died with new European diseases. The settlers then needed a new source of labor. They traded with African tribal chiefs and kings for their own slaves. More Africans were sent to modern-day Argentina and Brazil because of the diseases and cruelty of the new territories. At least three times as many Africans were sent to South America than its northern counterpart.
Answer:
He was a diehard capitalist and saw no need for a radical restructuring of America. Gompers quickly learned that the issues that workers cared about most deeply were personal. They wanted higher wages and better working conditions. These "bread and butter" issues would always unite the labor class.
Explanation:
The answer to your question is false
The Ottoman Empire was so powerful because it was a very big empire and it also regulated the trade. If there was trade it would have to be check by the Ottomans before it could be done.
