1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sattari [20]
3 years ago
8

Who is second-in-command to the President and takes over duties if the President can not fulfill his duties?

History
2 answers:
diamong [38]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

vice president

Explanation:

its right

snow_tiger [21]3 years ago
5 0
I will tell you that the correct answer is Vice President
You might be interested in
How fo judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in majority opinion ?
babunello [35]

The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence.

-----Apex.

4 0
3 years ago
Explain why poverty cause degradation of biodiversity in nepal​
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

"Wide range of natural resources and ecosystem services", of biodiversity.

Explanation:

The rural poor often depend on biodiversity for a wide range of natural resources and ecosystem services essential for their well-being, and are therefore potentially affected by its degradation. Against this backdrop, conservationists, development practitioners and policy makers often have differing opinions on how—and whether—to link biodiversity conservation with poverty reduction.

Nonetheless, the growing volume of literature on the subject often results in platitudes that fail to confront real problems faced by development projects, plans and policies. Indeed, the linkages between biodiversity and poverty are much more complex and dynamic that often assumed.

This is why endeavors to address the real issues—rather than pretending they do not exist—as well as efforts to be more specific about definitions, contexts and activities when undertaking assessments, are so badly needed.  

The rural poor often depend on biodiversity for a wide range of natural resources and ecosystem services essential for their well-being, and are therefore potentially affected by its degradation. Against this backdrop, conservationists, development practitioners and policy makers often have differing opinions on how—and whether—to link biodiversity conservation with poverty reduction. Nonetheless, the growing volume of literature on the subject often results in platitudes that fail to confront real problems faced by development projects, plans and policies.

Indeed, the linkages between biodiversity and poverty are much more complex and dynamic that often assumed; this is why endeavors to address the real issues—rather than pretending they do not exist—as well as efforts to be more specific about definitions, contexts and activities when undertaking assessments, are so badly needed. As a result, this paper first synthesizes the biodiversity-poverty debate in a static perspective by investigating scientific evidence on the links between biodiversity per se, ecosystems and well-being.

It further questions whether poor households particularly rely on biodiversity for their livelihoods. In dynamic terms, it thereafter explores whether biodiversity conservation is a route to poverty alleviation, and conversely if poverty alleviation is a route to better biodiversity management. We continue by presenting two emerging (or re-emerging) issues which challenge some key preconceived ideas about the poverty-biodiversity nexus.

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a reason why Europeans sought to come to the American colonies?
mezya [45]

The correct answer is (C) Religious freedom

7 0
3 years ago
Which of these American Indians groups still celebrate its heritage at powwows?
kotegsom [21]
Native American** and its piute
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did quakers eventually oppose african slavery? how was it opposed to their religious principles?
wariber [46]
<span>This change happened gradually. Quakers were some of the first people in the Americas to own slaves. However, objections were brought up by Dutch Quakers in the 18th century that changed the Christian sect's outlook on owning slaves. From these objections, Quakers gradually stopped owning slaves and became some of the most vocal abolitionists. The Quaker biblical justification was in the verse Matthew 7:12 which stated that Christians had a responsibility to adhere to a higher standard of living morally. The Quakers did not believe owning slaves was a part of living up to these standards.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • By ruling in James McCulloch’s favor in McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court agreed that
    12·2 answers
  • How did the middle class profit during the industrial revolution
    12·1 answer
  • How did the tactics help Germany occupy all these countries in Europe in such a quick amount of time ?
    7·1 answer
  • What were some ways Paleolithic people used fire?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the best illustration of the long-term effects of America’s use of the atomic bomb in Japan?
    15·2 answers
  • School-relayed- This is a survey for my journalism class. Comment yes or no and reasons why!
    7·2 answers
  • Help help help me ( wrong answers was scratch off )
    7·1 answer
  • What were some advances that were made in the North?
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPPPP
    14·1 answer
  • Who was a colonial-era minister known for religious tolerance?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!