Answer:
something incessant continues without interruption
Explanation:
like if your taking a bath you don't want to be bothered so you tell people not to bother you your going without interruption
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
<h3>A strong antagonist is highly motivated to act.</h3>
<h3> Strong and understandable motivations will make your antagonist feel like a real person and make the story that much better. The more plausible you make these motivation, the richer your villain, and the easier it will be to plot later.</h3>
<h2>
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> this</u></em><em><u> helps</u></em><em><u> you</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>❤️</u></em></h2>
<h2>
<em><u>Mark</u></em><em><u> me</u></em><em><u> as</u></em><em><u> brainliest</u></em></h2>
Your incorrect answers were 3 and 4.
For number 3, the correct answer is b. This is because not language is not necessarily oral (i.e. there are written languages).
For number 4, the correct answer is b. Although comparative linguistics is a branch of historical linguistics, comparative linguistics is specifically concerned with comparing the linguistics of one person/place from the next.
The correct answer is: Ensure that evidence is reasonable.
A logical fallacy refers to an error done in reasoning which makes an argument invalid. The conclusion of the argument doesn't follow logically from what peceded it.
A simple example would be: The toucan flies. The parrot flies, Therefore all birds fly.
Here we are making an erroneus conclusion by just using two examples to generalize an entire specie. If our evidence was checked in a correct way we would know that penguins or chickens don't fly.
Ensuring that the evidence is reasonable implies a deeper research on the topic and therefore a more complete knowledge about it. It is more probable to avoid making logical fallacies in this way. Empirical data will also help the author developing stronger arguments as they are supported by empirical evidence.
Using only pathos doesn't prevent you from making a logical fallacy, as the arguments to provoke an emotion could be wrong too, failling on it's purpose.
The correct answer is The Leatherstocking Tales.
James Fenimore Cooper belonged to the era of American Romanticism (19th century). He wrote a series of five books, titled The Leatherstocking Tales, about the relationship between the white people and the Native Americans. The novels in the series are: The Deerslayer, The Last of the Mohicans, The Pathfinder, The Pioneers, and The Prairie.