Answer: This argument has Some merits but it also has some logical errors that undermines its reasoning and conclusion.
Explanation:
(1) IT FAILED TO GIVE THE TOTAL POPULATION OF WORKERS FROM WHERE THE SAMPLE(1200 PEOPLE) WERE DERIVED AND WHAT SAMPLING METHOD WAS USED: This is a logical error, sampling has to be in RELATION TO THE POPULATION.The sampling method should have been defined.Samples may have been taken from a given A CLASS OF WORKERS.
(2) IT SHOULD HAVE GIVEN CLEARER AND OTHER CHOICES RELATED TO MANAGEMENT ISSUES: It should have made more choices of questions about management issues so that a BROAD, ELABORATE, REASONABLE,ACCURATE AND CONVINCING conclusion will be arrived at.
The correct option is III, I AND II.
The first sentence is a quotation, the second sentences is a paraphrase while the third statement is an attribution. A quotation refers to direct importation of the words said by another person, such words are usually placed inside quotation marks.
When none of the characters are true, but the setting may be true, and what happens in the story actually happened in real life (at least some- most of it)
hope this helps
Dilapidated house, as it states it was a house and the roof was scarcely visible , likely that it had collapsed
Answer:
i think its 2
Explanation:
it's a summary of the writing sooo yeah
