Answer:
Glaucon seemed to think the answer was no. But Paul Feldman sides with Socrates and Adam Smith—for he knows the answer, at least 87 percent of the time, is yes.
Explanation:
Compared with Feldman's argument, the tale of "The Ring of Gyges" is best described as a counterclaim to the idea that most people are moral. The tale is about the corruption of a man, Gyges, that found a ring that made him invisible. One he had that power he saw no reason to follow society's morals and did whatever he wanted to. One could argue that the reason that many people have to "behave" or to act according to the law and morals of a society is the look of others. The judgment that one would encounter should he not follow a certain rule, even if they are "little" things.
Well you have to research what and how it was in 1863 and see if you can get access any of Lincoln's writing and compare the two.
<span>The citations should be double-spaced.
</span><span>The citation entries should be in alphabetical order.
</span><span>The indent on the last entry should be corrected.
</span>Hope this helps! good luck! :D
C.flock canada is a pronoun, so not b. loudly is some type of verb so not d. and barn isn't collective.
