The reason why the first question is B. is because the second statement assumes that children are more similar to flowers than they actually are.
The reason why the second question is A. is because the first statement assumes that the kid failing is caused by the teacher doing a bad job teaching.
Both statements fail to prove themselves valid. They rephrase the wording from earlier in the claim.
Question 6: Either-or
The first claim assumes the only way to be a bad doctor is to get your medical degree overseas. It implies that you are either a skilled doctor or one who was educated overseas. In reality, there are more options. The second claim provides two options: a career that benefits humanity or one that makes them enough money. This is a fallacy because a career can be both rather than solely one or the other.
we currently have alot of issues so here are some suggestions like, amazon / australias huge wildfires , sexism , racism, pollution, criminal justice system on how its unfair/ needs improvement (your choice ) or my personal fav social economic problems