I think that a direct democracy is only workable at a small local level because in big places, there are too many people and a direct democracy cannot take place-
a direct democracy is when yu talk directly about wat yu think and yu express yer opinion that way;
in a smallest local level,every-ones opinion can be heard but it isn't possible when there are too many people; not every-ones opinion will be able to be heard..
so overall; there are too many ppl at the state and national levels to hear every-ones opinion, there needs to be few people to have a direct democracy.
Prices tend to rise if businesses cannot produce the quantity demanded by consumers. C.
Based on historical perspective, the statement NOT true about the Aztec Triple Alliance is that <u>"It was a council of equals similar to the Iroquois Conference."</u>
<h3>What is Aztec Triple Alliance?</h3>
Aztec Triple Alliance combines Mexico-Tenochtitlan, Tetzcoco, and Tlacopan that ruled the majority of the Mexican territory from 1428 to 1521.
However, compared with Iroquois Confederacy, the Aztec Triple Alliance had administrative control and the Kings.
On the other, the Iroquois Confederacy lacks administrative control.
Iroquois Confederacy lasted 1570 and 1600.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option C. <u>It was a council of equals similar to the Iroquois Conference.</u>
Learn more about Aztec Empire here: brainly.com/question/11871470