They owe them land, and lots of money for the damage caused
It is “My Baby” by Zendaya
Courts of general jurisdiction typically have a judge and jury.
<h3>Further explanation
</h3>
A court of general jurisdiction is a court with authority to hear cases of all kinds for example the criminal, civil, family, probate, etc.
Courts of general jurisdiction typically have a judge and jury. A judge is a public officer who presides over a lower court of law. A judge may be appointed by the executive branch of government through the Attorney General. Judge analyze and interpret all evidence in a court of law regarding cases to dictate a fair verdict and a sentence when necessary. Judge act as impartial mediators in courts of law, taking part in hearings, civil litigation cases, etc.
Many cases begin in this court. Usually, the cases are like felonies, serious misdemeanors, fraud, bankruptcy, and other "white collar crimes". In this courts of general jurisdiction, cases are heard through trial by the jury.
One significant effect of the classification of a court is the liability that a judge from that court might face for stepping beyond the bounds of that court.
Whereas a jury is a group of ordinary individuals who are chosen by a court to hear the evidence presented by the defendant and the plaintiff and a jury gives a verdict on a case
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- Learn more about general jurisdiction brainly.com/question/6995997
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: 9
Subject: history
Chapter: general jurisdiction
Keywords: general jurisdiction
Because they had no money and they wanted to try to work together and git money
Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.
The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level.
Explanation: The background of the Barron vs Baltimore case was a law suit filed by John Barron against the city of Baltimore. He claimed that Baltimore city had possessed his private property without any proper compensation. According to Bill of Rights he filed this law suit and the court ordered city to pay Barron. But an appellate court reversed the decision. Then Baron appealed to the Supreme court.
In 1833, Supreme court gave the decision in favor of the city. The cpourt asserted that the Bill of Rights is only effective with the federal government. Because the federal government is created according to the constitution and federal government is bound to follow the constitution rules like as bill of rights.But the states government is not bound to follow the Bill of Rights.
Therefore, the answer is option B.
