1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka94
3 years ago
6

How did General Sherman’s “March to the Sea” affect the Confederacy during the Civil War?

History
2 answers:
Mashcka [7]3 years ago
7 0
It completely devastated the Confederacy. Many plantations, homes, and businesses were destroyed and/or burned down. Everything from supplies to food was raided. It also greatly depleted Southern morale. 

lord [1]3 years ago
7 0

The March to the Sea was a military campaign to take over the port of Savannah.

On their way from the captured city of Atlanta to Savannah, Sherman's troops destroyed military targets, as well as industry, infrastructure and private properties, completely disrupting the Confederacy's economy, transportation and morale.

You might be interested in
Reading history critically means:
laiz [17]

Answer:

Reading history critically means reading with the awareness that the author has their own point of view, a bias one way or the other. There's a saying: "History books are written by the winners." For example, imagine a US army report on the effect of dropping the atom bomb on Hiroshima.

hope this helped....

4 0
3 years ago
Which speaker would most likely agree with President Ronald Reagan's national security policies?ASpeaker 1BSpeaker 2CSpeaker 3DS
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

They Broke the Mold When they Made Ronnie." - Nancy Reagan

On the last day of Ronald Reagan’s presidency, as he was walking out of the White House to his limousine for the ride to the Capitol, a White House aide looked at the President, and with tears in his eyes quietly said: “There will never be another one like him.”

Every president is unique, of course, but there was just something special about the man. Yet even people who knew Ronald Reagan well often had difficulty describing him. Optimistic but not naïve. Articulate but not glib. Intelligent yet guided by common sense. Well mannered but never pretentious. Friendly but not a pushover. Charismatic but real. Principled but not intransigent.

He was all of that and so much more. Perhaps the key to understanding Ronald Reagan is to realize his two defining characteristics – he genuinely liked people, and he was comfortable with who he was. That may not sound like much, but when you’re President, it makes all the difference.

President Reagan never tired of meeting people. He genuinely enjoyed campaigning, not just because he could advocate for his political positions on key issues, but mostly because he enjoyed being with people. You could see it in his eyes. There was a certain sparkle when he shook hands and exchanged a few words. He was not just “going through the motions.” He listened to what people had to say, and thought about what he could do to help. Often when he was back in his car or on Air Force One, he would turn to an aide and say: “There was a man back there who…” describing the person’s plight and asking what could be done about it.

It did not matter to Ronald Reagan whether you were the CEO of a Fortune 50 corporation, or the janitor who cleaned the CEO’s office at night. Station in life, gender, race, physical appearance, age – he did not care about any of those. What he cared about was people’s feelings. One time he made a speech that was not his best. The next day, after reading critical newspaper articles, he told his staff: “They’re right. It wasn’t a very good speech, but the poor fella who wrote it worked his heart out, and I was worried he would feel bad if I changed it too much.”

As great a speaker as he was, and as inspiring as his spoken visions could be, Ronald Reagan was equally happy telling a joke to a small group in a social situation. He would be quite animated, and always laughed heartily at the punch line – eyebrows raised, eyes crinkled, head back -- his wide smile lighting up the room. Maybe it was the Hollywood part of him that made him feel good about having made his audience laugh. And he was not afraid to laugh at himself. At the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinners, no one enjoyed the comedians more when they poked fun at the President than the President himself.

He even found ways to be friends with political adversaries. Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill, an old-time Democratic pol from Massachusetts, would say all kinds of mean things about President Reagan. But rather than get angry or carry a grudge, the President invented a rule that Tip could say whatever he wanted during the day, but at 6 PM, the politics would stop and they would be friends. Nothing told the story of Ronald Reagan’s magnanimity more than pictures of those two old Irishmen swapping stories and laughing uproariously in the evening after a day of pretty intense verbal assaults.

Explanation:That’s why he never let ego get in the way. It was not always about him. On his desk in the Oval Office, President Reagan kept a small plaque with the words: “There is no limit to what a man can do or where he can go if he does not mind who gets the credit.” He lived that in everything he did. Next to it was a sign that said: “It CAN Be Done.” The President kept it there to remind himself and visitors that in America, anything was possible – that we were limited only by our dreams.

It was Ronald Reagan’s happiness, his optimism, his enjoyment of life and his undying belief in the inherent goodness and spirit of the American people that got us to believe in ourselves again and put our country back on track. That, more than anything else, is the enduring legacy of the Presidency of Ronald Reagan.

4 0
3 years ago
Why did King Henry VIII have Thomas More beheaded?
miskamm [114]
King Henry VIII had Thomas More beheaded because Thomas More had refused to recognize the king as the head of the Church of England. Beheading was a common form of execution in those days. The correct answer is D. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Fill in the empty boxes in the wheel with the name of the Buddhist belief. Use the empty text box to write your explanation of e
evablogger [386]

Answer:

Ps mark brainliest

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Should public funds be used to provide programs for Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians even though no one li
horsena [70]

Answer:YES, TO ENABLE THEM BENEFIT FROM GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS.

Explanation: Public funds are funds gotten from the country,through the Sale of Natural resources,through Taxes,levies,fees and Fines etc. Public funds are collectively generated by all legal citizens of the United States of America. Public funds are used to carry out Public programs and projects aimed at the wellbeing and better life of all the Citizens of the United States of America.

Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians are recognised Native groups of the United States of America,hence they should benefit from Government programs and projects.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what region were Semitic religions predominant?
    8·1 answer
  • How were the eucharistic signs of bread and wine prefigured in the old testament?
    10·1 answer
  • Describe events in revolutionary war in the west
    7·1 answer
  • Pls dont copy and paste!!
    8·1 answer
  • What was judaeas status in the roman empire during the time jesus spread his message?
    10·1 answer
  • When labor union leaders negotiate a contract by representing all union members?
    5·1 answer
  • We know from historical records that The Spirit of the Laws by Baron de Montesquieu was placed on the Index of Forbidden Books b
    8·1 answer
  • Henry Knox served under George
    11·2 answers
  • Which is true of both the Plessy and Brown cases?
    10·2 answers
  • What is one reason why you might not believe that Moctezuma welcomed Cortés?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!