Answer:
$444.42
Explanation:
For computing the saving amount, first need to calculate the economic order quantity, total cost etc
The economic order quantity is
![= \sqrt{\frac{2\times \text{Annual demand}\times \text{Ordering cost}}{\text{Carrying cost}}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%5Ctimes%20%5Ctext%7BAnnual%20demand%7D%5Ctimes%20%5Ctext%7BOrdering%20cost%7D%7D%7B%5Ctext%7BCarrying%20cost%7D%7D%7D)
where,
Annual demand is
= 774 packaging crates × 12 months
= 9,932 crates
And, the carrying cost is
= $12 × 34%
= $4.08
![= \sqrt{\frac{2\times \text{9,288}\times \text{\$29}}{\text{\$4.08}}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%5Ctimes%20%5Ctext%7B9%2C288%7D%5Ctimes%20%5Ctext%7B%5C%2429%7D%7D%7B%5Ctext%7B%5C%244.08%7D%7D%7D)
= 363.37 crates
Now the total cost is
= Annual ordering cost + Annual carrying cost
= Annual demand ÷ Economic order quantity × ordering cost per order + Economic order quantity ÷ 2 × carrying cost per unit
= 9,288 ÷ 363 × $29 + 363 ÷ 2 × $4.08
= $742.02 + $740.52
= $1,482.54
Now the total cost in case of 774 packing crates is
= Annual ordering cost + Annual carrying cost
= Annual demand ÷ Economic order quantity × ordering cost per order + Economic order quantity ÷ 2 × carrying cost per unit
= 9,288 ÷ 774 × $29 + 774 ÷ 2 × $4.08
= $348 + $1,578.96
= $1,926.96
So, the annual saving cost is
= $1,926.96 - $1,482.54
= $444.42
Answer:
$33,850.00
Explanation:
The computation of the Adjusted gross income (AGI) is shown below:
= Wages + bank interest + lottery price - standard deduction
= $34,500 + $275 + $325 - $1,250
= $33,850
The standard deduction is a contribution to her traditional IRA. All other items which are given in the question are not relevant. Hence, we ignored it
CFCs already in the atmosphere will last for many more years.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option C.
Explanation:
If there is a new co worker hired in my office, and its her beginning days, and I, along with other team members see that she is not as productive as other members of the team are, and we all have to work more and harder to make up for her work. So i would preferably give her advice and tips for how to get things done correctly and efficiently. I would not like to get her out of the office, rather i will try to make her understand the things as soon as possible and give her tips to increase her work efficiency. But if the problem continues, and I believe that she will not be able to cope up with us, then i will talk to the supervisor and suggest him that she might not be the best role for us. But i will go with option C.
Answer: quid pro quo sexual harassment
Explanation:
The scenario represented in the question regarding Rhonda and her company's chief financial officer is referred to as quid pro quo sexual harassment.
Quid pro quo sexual harassment is a situation that occurs when benefits, pay, employment, position, training, title, position are based on the condition that the other individual involved agree to ones sexual advances. It should be noted that this is illegal.