The virus needs to speak the molecular language of cells. This is how he manages to dominate and enslave them so that they become factories for new viruses, producing the proteins that the infectious agent requires to assemble its descendants. If this conversation is not fine-tuned, even if the virus has the key and enters, it is doomed to failure.
<h3>Why does a virus lethal to us not infect animals?</h3>
For a virus to be able to enter a cell, it must have the right key. And this key, which are the proteins on the surface of viruses, has to enter the correct lock, the receptors that are on the cell membrane. Cells are actually houses with many different doors and locks. Some viruses have keys that open the lock of any cell and any kind of host, and others do not, so the infection caused by viruses is specific.
With this information, we can conclude that some viruses have keys that open the lock of any cell and any kind of host, and others do not, so the infection caused by viruses is specific.
Learn more about virus in brainly.com/question/1427968
#SPJ1
Man you need to change this to a different catagory
Answer:
Diazepam.
Explanation:
Taxonomy is the field of the biology that mainly concerns with the classification, nomenclature, identification an systematic of the organisms. Different categories are isoltype, holotype, haplotype and prototype.
Pototype may be defined as a type of model used in the cognitive science for the graded categorization. In the prototype some species is considered more central than the other species. In the given question, the diazepam can be used as a prototype.
Thus, the answer is diazepam.
Answer:
is spreading them c h e e k zzzz
Explanation:
Hey!
First, we must know the definition of a "qualitative observation." The definition of a qualitative observation is something that can be observed with our senses. Such senses include touch, taste, sight, smell, and hearing. It wouldn't directly involve measurements, weight, and exact sizes since we cannot know this from our senses alone.
Now, we can solve this problem with the process of elimination to find which option is the best fit for the definition.
We'll start with option one.
<em>Option One :</em>
<span>An observation in which the length, volume, or weight of something is measured.
</span>According to the definition, this statement cannot be the answer because it states it needs the length, volume, or weight of something is measured. A qua<span>litative observation does not need these things.
<em>This option is INCORRECT.</em>
Let's look at option two.
<em>Option Two :</em>
</span><span>An observation that depends on an objective measurement rather than a subjective assessment.
Again, this statement says that it depends on an objective measurement, which is something a qua</span><span>litative observation do not need.
<em>This option is INCORRECT.</em>
Moving on to option three.
<em>Option Three :</em>
</span><span>An observation in which something is counted.
According to the definition of a </span>qualitative observation, a <span>qualitative observation is going to require more than just counting an object. So, this cannot be the correct answer.
<em>This option is INCORRECT.</em>
With all of the options gone, this must mean that the last answer is the correct answer. But just to be 110% sure we'll take a look at the option.
<em>Option Four :</em>
</span><span>An observation in which the appearance of something is described using descriptive language.
According to the definition, this option is the correct option. It provides a close enough definition that matches a </span><span>qualitative observation. It states the checking the appearance of something in descriptive language.
<em>This is CORRECT.</em>
So,the answer to this question is...
<em>The option that provides a good definition for a </em></span><span><em>qualitative observation is</em> option D.
Hope this helps!
- Lindsey Frazier ♥</span>
