Answer:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland:
-The Second Bank of the United States was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not tax a federal institution
2- Gibbons v. Ogden:
-The state of New York was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not regulate commercial activities between states.
-A state-granted one company exclusive rights over the Hudson river.
Explanation:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1819, in which the state of Maryland was barred from levying a tax on federal banks operating in its territory. As a result, the principle of federalism triumphed over state rights, while the constitutional "Necessary and Proper Clause," which allows Congress to carry out certain actions not expressly stated in the Constitution but that appear to conform with those permitted activities, remained in effect.
2- Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court decision from 1824 that upheld the federal government's authority to control interstate trade. This is due to a dispute between New York and New Jersey, which was supposed to be settled by municipal courts but ended up breaching the Supreme Court's original authority and the states' right to equality.
Answer:
Khalifa Umar ibn Al-Khattab created the Hijiri calendar.
Japanese, Mexicans, and African Americans were all <span>targets for racism in the United States during World War II. The British were not.</span>
Early in the War of 1812, the governor of the Michigan territory led an attack on Canada that resulted in the surrender of Detroit. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option. It was a bad decision on the part of the governor of Michigan territory. I hope the answer helps.
Americans feared Napoleon might back out of their offer of money for his land, preventing the U.S. from acquiring New Orleans area. They agreed and signed the Louisiana Purchase<span> Treaty on April 30, 1803. If this helps give a brainliest :-)</span>
