<u>A scam is a fraudulent scheme used to make money</u>. True. A scam is an illegal plan for making money (a financial risk), especially when it involves tricking people. It is any deceptive and/or fraudulent scheme or action that is usually intended to gain financial advantage. There are types of scams such as online ones. The practice is based on inducing in some way the victim to send amounts of money in exchange for tempting promises.
<em>Scammers will use any means possible to steal your money. They invent convincing and seemingly legitimate reasons to give you false hope.</em>
Answer:
B). The model defines how people actually make decisions, under less than ideal conditions.
Explanation:
As per the question, if the administrative as well political models of decision-making are characterized as descriptive, it implies that 'the model defines how people actually make decisions when the situation is not ideal or less ideal'. The descriptive model of decision-making is associated with the ability to take decisions willfully under certain consistent rules. This theory considers the other external factors also that may affect people's decision-making under less-optimal or less-rational conditions because people not always take the decisions that 'should be or must be done' but rather according to their will. Therefore, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Buddhism, Confucianism, Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.
Answer:
Dr. Harrison's correlation theory is incorrect.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
- Dr. Harrison's correlation theory is correct.
- Dr. Harrison's correlation theory is incorrect.
- None of the above.
In this example, the theory that Dr. Harrison proposes is not correct. Dr. Harrison argues that because he saw a single man talking on his phone, it is necessarily true that talking on cell phone cause accidents. This theory is wrong for two reasons. First, Dr. Harrison is equation correlation with causation. The fact that the man was talking does not necessarily mean that this was the reason for the crash. There could be many other factors that can impact this. The second mistake that Dr. Harrison makes is thinking that one person is enough of a sample to reach such a conclusion. For the research to be valid, the doctor would need to use a much larger sample size.
