1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ipn [44]
3 years ago
9

What if Lincoln would allowed South Carolina to take fort summer in 1861

History
1 answer:
finlep [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

04/12/2011

On this date, a century and a half ago, Confederate forces fired on Fort Sumter, on an island off the coast of South Carolina. The Confederate States of America asserted not only their right to secede but also to claim federal property within their borders. The newly inaugurated U.S. president, Abraham Lincoln, rejected both claims and refused to evacuate Sumter.

“Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy,” Lincoln had said in his somber inaugural address a month earlier. “A majority, held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Whoever rejects it does of necessity fly to anarchy or despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left.”

The Civil War, to Lincoln, was never technically a “war” but an illegal and unconstitutional rebellion and a fight to put down the rebellion. The details of the events leading to the firing on Fort Sumter have much to do with this attitude and with his total rejection of the possibility of secession.

By attempting to resupply Sumter, Lincoln succeeded in forcing the Confederacy to fire the first shots. Lincoln had to accept the loss of Sumter soon after. But he was successful, so to speak, in forcing the other side to start the shooting. Lincoln believed that justified the military actions that he subsequently ordered to put down the rebellion.

You might be interested in
Why did child labor occur? What were the practical reasons for it?
elena55 [62]

Answer:

It occurred because it was cheaper and businesses could retain more money and underpay their workers. The practical reasons are that children are faster, they can fit into smaller spaces and are more controlled.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What key advances in knowledge and technology allowed Europeans to explore these new areas?
Ratling [72]
What key advances in knowledge and technology allowed Europeans to explore these new areas?

Your Answer: Compass

6 0
3 years ago
How did the Catholic Church respond to the Ninety-Five Theses? It implemented a few key reforms from the list. It created its ow
Salsk061 [2.6K]

The way that the Catholic Church responded to ninety-five Theses was: Catholic church condemed Martin Luther and asked him to recant.

The theses created by Martin Luther exposed the corrupt situation that was happening within the Catholic Church at that time. They beleive that if the ninety-five theses left uncontrolled, it would became a hindrance for the church's power within the government and create a financial defisit for the church.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The legend not investigated in North America was: Fountain of Youth Inca gold rich Indian tribes golden houses
IRINA_888 [86]
The Incas were an empire located in modern day <span>Peru. All the other choices were investigated in North America. Therefore, inca gold is your answer!

</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The debate over slavery divided the United States into two sides. The (west, north, south) emerged as the center of antislavery
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

The debate over slavery divided the United States into two sides. The north emerged as the center of antislavery activity during the abolitionist movement. The abolitionists objected to slavery for moral reasons. They believed that it was an unjust practice that stripped humans of their dignity.

Explanation:

Slavery was practiced in British America from the beginning of the colonial era, and was firmly established when the Declaration of Independence of the United States was signed. After this, there was a gradual expansion of abolitionism in the North, that stated that slavery was contrary to human dignity, while the rapid expansion of the cotton industry since the 1800s caused the South to cling tightly to slavery, and try to expand it into the new western territories of the country. Thus, slavery polarized the nation into slave states and free states through the Mason-Dixon line, which separated Maryland (slave) and Pennsylvania (free).

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did farmers in ancient Egypt use irrigation techniques?
    14·2 answers
  • explain the imbalance that existed in electoral districts prior to redrawing districts in 1964?what phrase did the supreme court
    15·1 answer
  • PLZ WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
    8·1 answer
  • What country did john cabot sail for
    11·2 answers
  • General who became the first president of the United States
    8·2 answers
  • How would the U.S. government most likely have responded if gold had been found on Indian Territory in 1845?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the Missouri Compromise of 1820 is correct?
    13·1 answer
  • Evaluate the relationship of the Latin American Republics with the United States in the post-colonial period.
    7·1 answer
  • One of the purposes of the FEMA and the red cross is to?
    14·2 answers
  • Who’s more powerful? The Presence (DC) or One-Above-All (Marvel)
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!