The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
I believe the answer is d, hunting
Taxation without Representation
Answer:
A Holocaust survivor recently reunited with a US soldier who help ... an 18-year-old American soldier who helped liberate the camp and ... And, as Raisa Katz points out, it was pure luck that the soldiers did arrive just then.
Explanation:
hope this helps god bless u and have a good day and mark me brainliest if u want :D
