Explanation:
There are many different trains of thought that lead Americans to their own mindset about the aid of Middle Eastern independence. Generally speaking, there are many people who believe that the United States should be the Police of the world or the hero of smaller countries and help them since they have the power to do so. Others believe that the United States has no rights of interfering in foreign affairs and should mind their own business. There are those who just don't agree with the idea of sending kids to die for other countries as well, no matter why.
Answer:
Unlike the largely negative liberties added to the U.S. Constitution in Bill of Rights ("Congress shall make no law..."), the Texas Constitution asserts the rights of citizens at the outset in Article 1. With its more positive tone the Texas Bill of Rights provides much the same protections as the U.S. Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
Answer:
a peaceful, gradual one that focuses on passing laws and winning cases in court.
Explanation:
Although the better approach to civil rights depends on the immediate circumstances and therefore must be subjective in nature. I consider a peaceful and gradual process a better one because in modern society, opting for violence is against law. It becomes very difficult to ask for rights and not performing one's responsibility as a member of society. Secondly, peaceful agitation helps you win public support all over the world.
Over time, the Soviet Union would either soften in its stance or would break apart from the internal contradictions of its system.
One of the things George Kennan said in his "long telegram" (8,000 words) sent in 1946 was that the USSR's overall methods of propaganda and control were negative and destructive. "It should therefore be relatively easy to combat it by any intelligent and really constructive program," he said. Urging a policy of containment rather than direct confrontation with the Soviet Union was a plan for waiting the nation to change in a positive direction or fail because it could not maintain control of its own system. Kennan said, "<span>Success of Soviet system, as form of internal power, is not yet finally proven. It has yet to be demonstrated that it can survive supreme test of successive transfer of power from one individual or group to another. ... Internal soundness and permanence of movement need not yet be regarded as assured."</span>
