1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixas84 [53]
3 years ago
14

The Treaty of Indian Springs (1825) and the Treaty of New Echota (1835) were similar in that each A) was a direct cause of the D

aholonega Gold Rush. B) was an attempt to ease conflict between slave-holders and non-slave-holders. C) resulted in the loss of American Indian land holdings in the Southeastern U.S. D) demonstrated the power of the Supreme Court in matters dealing with Indian removal.
History
2 answers:
nata0808 [166]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Correct Answer is C

Explanation:

  • A member of Lower Creek leaders headed by William McIntosh approved the Treaty of Indian Springs delivering up all resting Creek properties in Georgia.
  • Whereby all Creek properties in Georgia were ceded to the state.
  • The Treaty of New Echota was approved and signed in 1835 on this date, ceding Cherokee property to the U.S. in replacement for payment.
  • The coercive deportation of the Cherokee Nation from Georgia.
Wewaii [24]3 years ago
4 0

The answer is C. It resulted in the loss of American Indian land holdings in the southeastern portion of the United States

You might be interested in
1. What words does the author use to describe the powers in the Constitution?
Ierofanga [76]

Hello. You forgot to put the text to which this question refers. The text is:

After listing the numerous powers granted to Congress by the Constitution the author says:

My object is to consider that undefined, unbounded and immense power which is comprised in the following clause: “And to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this constitution in the government of the United States; or in any department or offices thereof.” Under such a clause as this, can anything be said to be reserved and kept back from Congress? ...

In giving such immense, such unlimited powers, was there no necessity of a Bill of Rights, to secure to the people their liberties? Is it not evident that we are left wholly dependent on the wisdom and virtue of the men who shall from time to time be the members of Congress? And who shall be able to say seven years hence, the members of Congress will be wise and good men, or of the contrary character?

Answer:

The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.

Explanation:

For the author, the constitution is highly powerful, since it has the capacity to possess immense, unlimited and indefinite power. This is a concern for the population of the country, because nothing guarantees that all this relevance will not be used for evil.

The power of the constitution is managed by those who administer it, the congressmen. No one guarantees that the members of the Congress are and will be just and good people, who will use all the power of the constitution for good.

4 0
3 years ago
How did the actions of emoperor Hadrian contribute to the delelopment of the Roman Empire
Sergio [31]

Answer:

See Explanation

Explanation:

He was a powerful ruler committed to strengthening the Empire. Hadrian oversaw several important building projects, including the Temple of Venus and Hadrian's Wall. He sponsored public work projects in Athens, and granted Greeks equal representation in Rome.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which are correct definitions for history? Choose all answers that are correct. A. a narrative anchored in chronology B. the sto
sveta [45]

It looks like B and C are the correct answers.

History involves those things- we study the past to learn about the world back then.

3 0
3 years ago
what was the conflict between native americans and the U.S government relating to western lands? How did this conflict get resol
puteri [66]
The conflict arose because the US citizens wanted to spread towards the western shores and pushed the Natives out of their land and forced them to migrate. The conflict didn't get resolved since there was war and fighting because many didn't want to go, but in the end they were placed in reservations.
5 0
4 years ago
Who won the battle of Poitiers
Montano1993 [528]
England won the battle of  Poitiers!
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which acts was passed in the late 1800s to exclude an entire ethnic group
    8·2 answers
  • Why is Florida susceptible to sinkholes?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these choices was not a duty of the Assembly?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the main concern of confucianism?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Roosevelt propose a second New Deal?
    13·1 answer
  • How were the colonists’ views on government influenced during the American Revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • For what reasons did bosses reduce workers' pay?
    11·1 answer
  • In a Constitutional Monarchy one advantage is that there is a balance of power between the monarch and.....??
    7·2 answers
  • Why does Orwell object to the Burmese’s prejudice against him? In Shooting an Elephant?
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the most notorious and corrupt political leader of New York City' Tammany Hall?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!