Answer:
Have we inventoried the third party relationships that exist in our organization today?
How are we identifying and tracking new or changing relationships?
Have we assessed and prioritized the risks related to those relationships?
When evaluating new relationships, do our selection criteria address risks to the organization?
Where applicable, do our agreements and contracts include adequate terms and conditions to require third-parties to provide independent assurance to mitigate potential risks, convey trust and confidence, and demonstrate compliance with laws and regulations?
Are responsibilities to manage these risks clearly defined individually for each third-party and as a whole?
Are we monitoring the various risks and contract requirements associated with each existing relationship and at what interval?
Are these relationships dependent on subservice organizations?
How do we gain comfort that information provided by third-parties is valid, accurate, and complete?
Does our risk assessment process identify potential negative events resulting from third party relationships and include procedures in place to respond?
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. If data indicates the economy is in recession and members of Congress are working to pass legislation to encourage economic growth, then an a<span>nalysis of policy's effectiveness has occurred. The Congress most likely saw that the existing policies were not effective.</span>
Answer:
1. True
Explanation:
Marginal rate of substitution is quantity of good which a consumer will need to have in order to leave another good. The MRS equals to Px/Py. This will decrease when the demand curve decreases.
Answer:
a) an interior optimum (firm value maximizing) debt ratio
Explanation:
Trade off Theory is about capital structure of an economic unit. It mentions about the benefit of debt - ie tax saving, as interest on debt is tax deductible; & cost of debt - bankruptcy & insolvency risk, due to fix interest cost.
The theory depicts the debt level, which is best to - balance interest tax shield against the costs of financial distress imply, which implies that it seeks a balance between benefit & cost of debt.
So, the theory finds the best interior optimum (firm value maximising) debt equity ratio.