1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
8090 [49]
3 years ago
10

What was Dred Scott v. Sanford about

History
1 answer:
Vaselesa [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

It is about a conflict

Explanation:

They were both friends until they turned to each other because of partition problems.

This caused them to rebel.

I hope this satisfies you. If u have any further questions please let me know. Make sure you follow me and make this the brainliest answer.

You might be interested in
Marshall was a rancher in New Mexico. His dog ran off and he had to chase her past the boundaries of his ranch. When he finally
Anettt [7]

Keeping in mind the description of the stone point given in the story, we can state Marshall the rancher was looking at a Folsom point.

As it's known, a Folsom is a kind of stone point with a leaf-like shape which has a concave base and wide, shallow grooves/flutes running almost the entire length of the point.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As he lays dying on the floor of the senate in Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, Caesar says these words.
Debora [2.8K]
The answer would be A.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do religious wars change and shape nations
Sonja [21]

Hello there!! Here is your answer: The Wars of religion were a series of religious wars which were waged in Europe in the 16th, 17th and early 18th centuries. The wars, which were fought after the Protestant Reformation began in 1517, disrupted the religious and political order in the Catholic countries of Europe. However, religion was not the only cause of the wars, which also included revolts, territorial ambitions, and Great Power conflicts. For example, by the end of the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648), Catholic France was allied with the Protestant forces against the Catholic Habsburg monarchy. The wars were largely ended by the Peace of Westphalia (1648), establishing a new political order that is now known as Westphalian sovereignty.

The conflicts began with the minor Knights' Revolt (1522), followed by the larger German Peasants' War (1524–1525) in the Holy Roman Empire. Warfare intensified after the Catholic Church began the Counter-Reformation in 1545 against the growth of Protestantism. The conflicts culminated in the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648), which devastated Germany and killed one-third of its population. The Peace of Westphalia (1648) put an end to the war by recognising three separate Christian traditions in the Holy Roman Empire: Roman Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Calvinism.[4][5] Although many European leaders were "sickened" by the bloodshed by 1648,[6] religious wars continued to be waged in the post-Westphalian period until the 1710s, including the Wars of the Three Kingdoms (1639–1651) on the British Isles, the Savoyard–Waldensian wars (1655–1690), and the Toggenburg War (1712) in the Western Alps. Popular memory of the wars lasted even longer.  =THIS INFORMATION IS FOUND FROM WIKIPEDIA=

6 0
3 years ago
I have a speech to write this week and I need some help the speech is going to me about Balancing power in the constitution.
hjlf

Answer:

i dont have it all but

Explanation:

Second paragraph: Discuss the separation of powers and checks and balances. Use examples to explain the difference between the two ideas.

Congress can approve a bill that will then be sent to the President but the president can veto the bill if they dont like it, no matter what.

Third paragraph: Discuss the position of the Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.

Federalists think Constitution already limits powers of government, and we don’t need a Bill of Rights

Fourth paragraph: Discuss the position of the Anti-Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.

The Anti-Federalists Will not ratify Constitution unless it has a Bill of Rights. They feel like the government is too strong and the Constitution does not provide enough protection

7 0
3 years ago
The policies of the European Union (EU) and
Bond [772]
The policies of the European Union (EU) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) have both resulted in an improvement in containment efforts.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • which of the following is an example of the principle of checks and balances? (1 point) presidents can veto an act of congress.
    9·2 answers
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    13·1 answer
  • Explain the difference between the March on Washington led by Dr. King, and the AIM march, Trail of Broken Treaties.
    5·2 answers
  • The French Huguenots migrated to America because they were being persecuted for:
    15·2 answers
  • Why did the founding fathers compromise on using a federal system for the new government?
    12·2 answers
  • What is the name of the convention that caused President Monroe to issue the Monroe Doctrine?
    11·1 answer
  • WWII had two very separate and distinct arenas: the Pacific and Europe.
    6·1 answer
  • Andrew Carnegie's fortune went to what cause?<br><br>​
    15·1 answer
  • Please help me on this question if you would want brianleist!! Tank yah!! ^^
    6·1 answer
  • Explain the political and economic impact the Spanish had on Mexico and its impact on European colonial exploration?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!