All categories

4 years ago

Around which latitude(s) would you expect to find rainforests, and why? ( you may enter up to 150 characters. )

2 answers:

6 0

You could find rain forests in the location from 23 north to 23 south latitude; This is because hadley cells (low-latitude overturning cycles that have air) begin to rise at equator and cools; this in turn causes them to hold less water vapor, and thus condenses to making rain.

Snezhnost [94]4 years ago

3 0

Rainforests are one of the oldest ecosystems in the world today and are characterized by forests that grow in areas with tropical climates and abundant rain.

Hence, rainforests best grow between the Tropic of Cancer (23.5N) and the Tropic of Capricorn (23.5S).

Around the world, we can see rainforest lying on these latitudes including in Brazil and South East Asia.

You might be interested in

People working in a bank must have

vladimir2022 [97]

Good knowledge of mathematics i believe

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why should new foods be introduced to an infant one at a time?

il63 [147K]

Because an infants taste buds may be stronger

6 0

3 years ago

Consider the following game in which two firms decide how much of a homogeneous good to produce. The annual profit payoffs for e

inessss [21]

Answer:

Consider the following explanation

Explanation:

Context

Game theory involves two players. They have more than one option to decide. Pay off from each options adopted by two players are available. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their own return. But for optimizing their decision, they have to consider the action of his rival.

In this problem, two players are firm A and firm B. They have two strategies low output and high output. The strategies of firm a are measured in rows and for firm B in columns. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their payy off. Each cell has two pay offs. First one is for Firm A and second one is for firm B.

1. Dominant strategy is a strategy which will always give higher payoffs in comparison with pay off of other strategies. Consider first strategy of firm 1. If it adopts strategy of low output, then firm 2 can also adopt either strategy of low output or high output. In that case pay off of firm 1 will be 300 or 200.

Alteratively if firm 1 adopts high output then pay offs are 200 or 75. 200 is earned if firm B also go for low productivity. It is 75 if firm B adopts high productivity.

Now compare two payoffs side by side. Note that firm A has higher pay off in low output [300,200] in comparison with the pay off of high output [200,75]. So whatever strategy firm B adopts, Firm A will always go for low production. So low production strategy of firm A dominates high production strategy.

Same result is not observed for firm B. Pay off from low production strategy of firm B is [ 250,75]. Pay off from high production strategy are [100,100]. Now compare the two. If Firm A go for low production, then firm B will select low production. It will give pay off 250. Similarly when firm A decides for high production, then firm will also decide for high production. It will maximize its pay off. Amount is 100. Thus no strategy dominates for firm B.

5 0

3 years ago

A $150 petty cash fund has cash of $54 and receipts of $83. The journal entry to replenish the account would include a

Reptile [31]

Answer:

Option A.

Explanation:

It is given that a $150 petty cash fund has cash of $54 and receipts of $83.

We need to find the journal entry to replenish the account.

Cash and receipts = Cash + receipts

= $54 + $83

= $137

Short for cash = Cash fund - Cash and receipts

= $150 - $137

= $13

The required journal entry to replenish the account would include a debit to Cash Over and Short for $13.

Therefore, the correct option is A.

3 0

3 years ago

ACTION STEPS (What will be done) Step 1 Plann Step 2 4 Step 3 rll 의 Step 4 Step 5 Pa complete (5)

pochemuha

I’m not sure………………………. ….

8 0

3 years ago