Do you know the context?
I suppose the quotation is stressing that the writer has put a lot of effort into getting their argument/grievances heard by the parliament, and that said parliament is 'tyrannical', implying that it rules without concern for the people or accountability to them. It seems that the quote may be a way of justifying some later action, essentially saying; 'we've tried and failed to do this in the proper way, so now we must be more forceful'.
<span>This is true. The British army was much larger and much more developed, but the colonial army managed to win by winning the support of the people and of foreigners. They were helped by British enemies such as France who was willing to give not only weapons and money, but also its navy and its generals with their war expertise. </span>
Central powers (Germany and Austria -Hungarian empire mainly) were in WW1 , while the axis powers(Germany,Italy and Japan) were in WW2
I think <u>it's a good idea that we get conscious as a society about preserving important documents, which safety we may take for granted because they're stored online</u>. However, when it comes to content that is harder to categorize as either public or private, we need to think more carefully about how we make that distinction.
In the past, people wrote stuff on notepads in their home or kept diaries which should be considered private; and you could also write a book and release it or letters to the newspaper which would be considered public. Now we can also do those things but there are platforms that place our information in between, like cloud storage or social media. <u>Is a facebok post private or public?</u>
I believe the law should adapt in order to protect our information against disclosure and make the distinctions between public and private affairs in online platforms more clear to keep a balance.
Hope this helps!
