Answer:
Austere Corporation
The amount of the proceeds from the bond that should be recorded as an increase in liabilities is:
= $320,100.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
The bonds issued = $330,000 at 106
Number of $1,000 bonds issued = 330 ($330,000/$1,000)
Market value of each warrant = $3
Proceeds from issue of bond = $330,000*106% = $349,800
Fair value of warrant issued = 330*30*$3 = $29,700
The bond issue liability = $349,800 - $29,700 = $320,100
Answer: The price elasticity of demand for good A is 0.67, and an increase in price will result in a increase in total revenue for good A
Explanation:
The following can be deduced form the question:
P1 = $50
P2 = $70
Q1 = 500 units
Q2 = 400 units
Percentage change in quantity = [Q2 - Q1 / (Q2 + Q1) ÷ 2 ] × 100
Percentage change in price = [P2 - P1 / (P2 + P1) ÷ 2 ] × 100
% change in quantity = (400 - 500)/(400 + 500)/2 × 100
= -100/450 × 100
= -22.22%
% change on price = (70 - 50)/(70 + 50)/2 × 100
= 20/60 × 100
= 33
Price elasticity of demand = % change in quantity / % change on price
= -22.22 / 33
= -0.67
This means that a 1% change in price will lead to a 0.67% change in quantity demanded. As there was a price change, there'll be a little change in quantity demanded because demand is inelastic. Thereby, he increase in price will lead to an increase in the total revenue.
Therefore, the price elasticity of demand for good A is 0.67, and an increase in price will result in an increase in total revenue for good A
Answer:
Each company drills two wells and experiences a profit of $22 million.
Explanation:
If each company acts independently and drills two oil wells each they will have a total of 4 wells each worth (60 million ÷ 4= $15 million.
Each company will have two oil wells which equals (2* 15 million = $30 million)
But each company incurs cost of $4 million per well. That is total cost of $8 million.
Therefore the profit for each company will be $30 million - $8 million= $22 million
Answer:
The definition becomes defined in the clarification paragraph below, according to the particular circumstance.
Explanation:
- As either the engineering boss, I believe Sally knows her technical employees better upon where people choose and hate about either the meetings that have been taking place. She understands that her workers like freedom but also that requesting them should report periodically or daily will potentially hinder their efficiency, and also some waste work and attention.
- Therefore, Sally can find some middle ground path somewhere, practically. She might make an option in which those her boss, Mark Hayes, the director of engineering, including her staff should be satisfied with the conclusion reached. Sally would invite Mark please hold a regular meeting to provide a more excellent method rather than just group communication. Any efficiency improvements barely alter a day, cost too much, and often waste precious time. She should indeed, lift all the questions concerning her workers as well as the negatives involved with either the regular interactions.
- She could also ensure fine to measure throughout her workers to hold regular sessions because it will encourage the business to always have a daily transcript of the conversation the week before and whether performance might be enhanced within this meeting can already be covered.
