In short, the Colonial system of indentured servitude (working for 5-7 years for someone to pay them back for your trip across the Atlantic) was running out of people. So the British brought African peoples across.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the argument having to do with the fact that capitalism is the driving force of wealth--since without these leaders capitalism would cease to thrive. </span></span>
I am pretty sure the answer is true but I haven't really researched this topic so I couldn't say it's definitely true
Generally speaking, a stance that supports a particular interpretation of history is known as a "<span>Historical argument," although there can still be bias involved depending on the historian's delivery. </span>
