Which statement accurately describes the supremacy clause of the

History

1 answer:

arsen [322]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: option (C). It says federal laws are superior to state laws.

Explanation: The supremacy clause of the constitution tells us that the federal laws is above the state laws. The farmers of the constitution included the supremacy clause in the constitution because they believed that the central government needed to have more power than the state government.

Article VI, paragraph 2 of the United State constitution declares that the constitution, laws, and treaties of the central government is supreme law of the land to which judges in every state are bound irrespective of what the state laws says. The law establish the federal law and the federal constitution supersede the state laws and state constitution. The law strictly prohibits the states from interfering with the central government constitution and government exercise that are exclusively entrusted to the central power.

You might be interested in

What is the highest peak in the lower 48 states?

Lerok [7]

Answer: B

Explanation: i hope this help you and have a good day

6 0

2 years ago

A process that directly describes the growth of cities is

ELEN [110]

Answer:

i believe it would be urbanisation as the defination for urbanisation is Urbanization refers to the population shift from rural areas to urban areas, the gradual increase in the proportion of people living in urban areas, and the ways in which each society adapts to this change.

7 0

2 years ago

What did independent oil producers in Texas do when the government ordered them to limit production? Why did they choose to this

WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

They didn't care about what the government say. Because of this, they would sneak at night to turn off the wells. This also helped a lot. Why?, because they didn't want to upset their families.

Explanation:

I took the test

3 0

2 years ago

The Bush administration cracked down on drug trafficking from

Ad libitum [116K]

The middle east is the answer

4 0

3 years ago

What historical change led to a devaluation of women's work in the home?

andriy [413]

The industrial revolution changed the social and financial estimation of unpaid "housework." Although a great part of the real work that ladies performed in the "local circle" continued as before over the nineteenth century—cooking, cleaning, looking after kids, keeping up family social connections, and generally dealing with the family unit economy—socially it lost a lot of its previous esteem. As one student of history has put it, the "sexual orientation division of work" that once existed gradually turned into "a gendered meaning of work": men earned wages outside the home ("work"), and ladies did unpaid work ("not work") inside it.

8 0

3 years ago