Answer:
Number 1
Explanation:
Although the ear began with Mazi German's attack on Poland in September 1939. The United States did not enyer the war until after the Japanese bombed the American fleet in Pearl Habour Hawaii on December 7, 1941
Answer:
Multiple reimbursement scheme
Explanation:
What Donna Holbrook did is considered a case of multiple reimbursement. This means she requested the payment of the expense more than once. She first used the company credit card to buy the office supplies. This means that she didn’t use her own money because the credit card wasn’t hers. But a month after that, she used the receipt to request reimbursement from the company implying that she bought those supplies with her own money. By doing so, the company is paying twice for a purchase that was done only once. There’re also other kind of expense reimbursement schemes: <u>fictitious expense schemes</u> (when the expense is actually not real but made up by the employee); <u>overstated expense schemes</u> (when the employee inflates the expense in order to keep the extra money); and <u>mischaracterized expense schemes</u> (this occurs when the employee intends to get reimbursement for an expense that is personal and not related to the business).
Episodic binge eating followed by purging is a characteristic of the condition called Bulimia Nervosa.
Bulimia Nervosa is a a eating disorder which is characterized by episodes of overeating called as binge eating followed by purging by self-induced vomiting.
It is a potentially life threatening condition in which there is over fasting that can be dangerous for life. It is mostly seen in teenage girls who are excessively self obsessed about their body structure.
It can cause dehydration, fatigue, electrolyte imbalance, anxiety and mood swings.
To learn more about binge eating here
brainly.com/question/19130278
#SPJ4
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following.
The kind of testimony their claim represents is a general statement without any evidence to prove it. It is not a claim of fact because it does not present any evidence. It is neither a claim of policy. We could say that it could be a claim of value, but it doesn't say if this is good or bad.
So it is important to include some type of evidence to back our affirmations. Without the proper evidence, then it is their opinions against ours.
So it is hard to believe that hunters Harlen E. Ford and Billy Mills have seen Bigfoot at one time if they don't provide proper evidence.
