An article published in 2013 by the American Psychological Association will be the best and the most credible source to be used in the paper. Thus, option D is correct.
<h3>What are credible sources?</h3>
Credible sources are informational platforms written by persons who are experts and have a particular field of knowledge. They can be cited in the papers as they are from credible authors and can be checked for accuracy of the facts.
The peer-reviewed journals and professional organizations are some of the reliable sources and provide the correct information. A recent article published in 2013 by the American Psychological Association is a credible source.
American Psychological Association is an organization that has experts and specializes in psychology studies. They will publish the most accurate data compared to the manufacturer, young adult, or the Department of Education.
Therefore, option D. American Psychological Association is the most credible source.
Learn more about credible sources here:
brainly.com/question/13945904
#SPJ1
It seems that the BJP government’s decision to illegalise the sale of cattle for slaughter at animal markets has its roots in a PIL that quotes the five-yearly Gadhimai festival in Nepal, where thousands of buffaloes are taken from India to be sacrificed to ‘appease’ Gadhimai, the goddess of power.
The contradictions that emerge from cattle – here encompassing all bovines – slaughter rules in Nepal perplex many: despite being predominantly Hindu, animal sacrifice continues to be practised. Cow slaughter is explicitly prohibited even in Nepal’s new constitution since it is the national animal, yet the ritual sacrifice of buffaloes and the consumption of their meat is not frowned upon. There is also, in marked contrast to the Indian government’s blanket approach to cattle terminology, a lucid distinction between cows (both the male and female) and other ‘cattle’ species (such as buffaloes and yaks).
The emergence of this contradictory, often paradoxical, approach to cattle slaughter in Nepal is the result of a careful balancing act by the rulers of modern Nepal. The Shah dynasty and the Rana prime ministers often found themselves at a crossroads to explicitly define the rules of cattle slaughter. As rulers of a perceived ‘asal Hindu-sthan’, their dharma bound them to protect the cow – the House of Gorkha borrows its name from the Sanskrit ‘gou-raksha’ – but as they expanded into an empire, their stringent Brahminic rules came into conflict with des-dharma, or existing local customs, where cattle-killing was a norm. What followed was an intentionally ambiguous approach to cattle slaughter, an exercise in social realpolitik.
Answer:
Nadia may or may not fail to develop if she is a quiter with that said, if she really wants to help in the kitchen shr e will have to wait a little longer because her steady body may not be able to handle the stress of kitchen work
Repetition
"plainy, succinctly, without comment" are all words that cna describe minimal
"have ..." construction used repeatedly in the last few lines, "have terrified, have tortturend"
tell me if this is right
