It is either a or b but im leaning more towards a
Answer:
lol
Explanation:
At the same time, the plague brought benefits as well: modern labor movements, improvements in medicine and a new approach to life. Indeed, much of the Italian Renaissance—even Shakespeare's drama to some extent—is an aftershock of the Black Death.
I think the answer is A.
The person is making a deduction by connecting the two works with Homer.
Homer wrote both these epics. Odysseus becomes prominent in later part of the
Iliad. It is in the Odyssey that he is
the main character in the story.
Just simply looking at this, I believe that I would be able to see three that <span>Thomas Jefferson's three arguments against Hamilton's financial program that would actually be applicable here in this case.
The ones in bold would be your correct answer:
</span><span>A) Southern states had paid their debts; the other states could do the same.
B) The Constitution did not give the federal government the right to create a national bank.
C) The paying of war debts by the federal government would establish trust in the country.
D) A strong federal government was vital for the nation.
E)Tariffs would hurt Southern farmers.</span>
The declaration of independence
