Answer:
d.All of these choices would reduce risk for your portfolio and therefore show at least some benefit to diversification
Explanation:
Which of the following securities could NOT have any benefits for diversification with your investment portfolio? All of these choices would reduce risk for your portfolio and therefore show at least some benefit to diversification
Answer:
The additional sale will not conflict with regular sales.
Explanation:
Accept business at a special price if the additional sales conflict regular sales. That is, special price must maintain the status quo or improve it.
Answer:
Concentrated Targeting Strategy
Explanation:
Concentrated Targeting Strategy refers to a situation in which an organization focus its marketing efforts on only a specific segment of the market. That is, only one marketing mix is developed.
Concentrated Targeting Strategy allows the producer focus on the needs and wants of a particular segment of the consumers/ population. The producer directs all it's efforts to the satisfaction of a segment of the consumers.
Concentrated Targeting Strategy could be disadvantageous if the demand of the focused segment of consumers is low. Low demand will affect the financial position of an organization.
Ride sharing is transformational innovation, according to the innovation matrix.
Uber and Lyft use transformational innovation
- Transformational innovation includes making discoveries and creating products for the market.
- Companies like Uber use credit and debit cards for reservations, a novel tactic.
- Such ideas were virtually unknown to markets in many nations.
- In some markets, it gave businesses like Uber a competitive edge.
To learn more about transformational innovation, refer to-
brainly.com/question/17517143
#SPJ4
Answer:
E) Congressional incumbents
Explanation:
PAC money is directed primarily toward congressional incumbents, and this can easily be verified on the web. For example, both Nancy Pelosi, a democrat, and Brian Fritzpatrick, a republican, are among the top incumbents by number of money received from PACs, thus, party affiliation is not as important as it is incumbent status.
This is probably because incumbents are more likely to win elections, whether in the senate, the house, or even, the presidency.
