Answer:
Your friend is not reasoning correctly
Explanation:
I'd say, since he admit to putting so much time and effort into psychology, there's simply no need to drop the course. So therefore, your friend is incorrectly reasoning.
Answer: The correct answers are "A. Accept" and "$ 0.01".
Explanation: Given that we talk about optimal strategy when maximizing the expected profit by the player:
In the first case It is convenient to accept the proposal and keep $ 0.12, instead of rejecting it and running out of nothing.
And in the second case it is convenient to give the classmate as little as possible so that he accepts and we have a greater profit.
Answer: Yes, because it is a contract whose terms prevent possible performance within one year
Explanation:
The Statute of Fraud mandates that certain contracts need to be written down. These contracts include the sale of land, amounts involving more than $500 and contracts that have a timeframe of over a year.
Melinda entered into a contract with terms that have to be fulfilled in more than a year. It is therefore under the Statute of Frauds.
Answer:
This is correct
Explanation:
There will be two entries. One at the time of receiving cash on 1st July . That would be
Cash. B. $6600 (debit)
Unearned Rent Revenue. $ 6600 (credit)
On 31st Dec an adjusting entry would be made . The rent for 6 months will be calculated which will be as given above.
Rent for 6 months = ( 6,600/12 )* 6= $ 3,300
The entry will be
Unearned Rent Revenue $3,300 (debit)
Rent Revenue $ 3,300 (credit)
$ 3300 will be deducted from the current liabilities on the credit side.
Rent Revenue of $3300 will be added on the credit side of the income statement.
Answer: it is called a salary
Explanation:
