Answer: A) people to buy Yoo-hoo in St. Petersburg and sell it in New York until the price was the same in each country
Explanation:
As the Yoo-hoo is cheaper in St. Petersberg than in New York, this presents an arbitrage opportunity to buy cheap and sell higher. People will therefore buy from St.Petersberg at the price of $1 and then sell it in New York for $2 thereby making a 100% profit.
Once this happens more and more people will start doing this which would lead to an increase in demand for St. Peterberg Yoo-Hoos. According to the Law of Demand, when demand rises, the price will rise as well so the price in St. Petersberg will keep rising till it gets to the same amount in New York thereby dissuading people from buying to take advantage of the opportunity.
Answer:
$60 million
Explanation:
The quick ratio is the financial ratio of the current assets less inventory to current liabilities. While the accounting equation shows the relationship between the elements of a balance sheet which are assets liabilities and equity.
This may be expressed mathematically as
Assets = Liabilities + Equity
Given that quick ration is 1.7 and current liabilities = $50 million
1.7 = current assets less inventory/$50 million
current assets less inventory = 1.7 * $50 million
= $85 million
The total asset is made up of the current assets less inventory, inventory, fixed assets. Let the balance for fixed assets be y
$85 + $65 + y = $210 (all amounts in millions)
y = $210 - $150 (all amounts in millions)
y = $60 (all amounts in millions)
Answer:
$7.50 per direct labor hour
Explanation:
Calculation for the predetermined overhead allocation rate
Using this formula
Predetermined overhead allocation rate = Factory overhead/Direct labor hours
Let plug in the formula
Predetermined overhead allocation rate = $1,500,000/200,000 hours
Predetermined overhead allocation rate = $7.50 per direct labor hour
Therefore the predetermined overhead allocation rate is $7.50 per direct labor hour
Answer:
Produce goods and services with less of everything that goes into the process.
Explanation:
I would politely tell the interviewer that I am not able to answer that question as it would be considered an invasion of personal privacy as per the Privacy Act of 1974, I would then point out that I do my best to always respect the privacy of others, and of course follow all laws and rules as set forth by my employer, and state and federal law. Emphasize to the interviewer, that I am a person who can be trusted.