Answer:
Explanation:
Four words.
They got the vote.
- It was not so much that they got the vote. It was how they got it.
- They were united.
- They were forceful.
- They were nonviolent for the most part.
- They were organized.
- They had terrific leadership.
- Their work was recognized, especially by Woodrow Wilson.
They saw in each other the same virtues and values that many had. They just weren't dishwasher to men's whims and freedoms.
They were no longer servants. They fought and bickered and men had little to fight back with except children. Some became flappers and exercised their freedom, and partied on. It was more acceptable to do that in the 20s.
A)<span> President Kennedy ordered a panel of scientists to appraise the DDT hazard.</span>
<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
Answer:
FRONTLINE's The Rise of ISIS is a major, in-depth investigation of the brutal terrorist group's ascent, drawing on in-depth interviews with Iraqi politicians, and American policymakers and military leaders to explore and explain how ISIS developed into what one interviewee calls “the Al Qaeda that Osama bin Laden only ...
Explanation:
