It was a way for them to get a word out there yes. But there isn't anything really that was done to make the government consider liberty for women. They could have used symbolism such as reenactments of different events or an event that could be changed or would have been changed if women could have voted or could vote. Along with that, several chants and signs with partitions signed by several known people and other citizens. That would have been a better demonstration.
Answer:
I think its the third one or the first
Explanation:
Answer:
U KNOW THAT WE CANT DO THIS RIGHT BECAUSE WE WOULD 1.HAVE TO WRITE ITT ON PAPER OR GOOGLE DOCS 2.SCREENSHOT 3.NEED YOUR EMAIL 4. NEED YOUR PHONE NUMMBER 5. SEND IT 6. IT TAKE BOUT 1 HOUR
Explanation:
Answer:
A strong economy depends the most on the government and trading
Explanation:
Answer:
Commercial speech is one of the categories of speech that enjoys lesser protection under the First Amendment.
Two types of commercial speech in particular, are given less or null protection: false advertising, and misleading advertising. The justification is to protect the rights of consumers, and of other companies.
If Pizza Hut prints materials that are untruthful about Papa John's, then Pizza Hut is committing misleading advertising, because it is spreading false information about its direct competitor. In this scenario, Pizza Hut could easily sue Papa John's in court, and win the case.
