<u>Answer:
</u>
It can be said that the student version exemplifies paraphrasing plagiarism.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The contexts of the texts given above under the titles original source material and student version are clearly the same.
- It can be observed that most words used in both texts are the same but the arrangement of the words is different.
- To retain the meaning of the text but still make the text look different, the formation of the sentences has been made differently using the same words.
- Hence, it can be called an example of paraphrasing plagiarism.
Answer:
"In international environmental agreements, the idea that scientific uncertainty should not be used as an excuse for inaction is known as:" <u>The precautionary approach.</u>
Explanation:
The precautionary approach is ability to asserts that the burden of proof for potentially harmful actions by industry or government rests on the assurance of safety. And that, when there are threats of serious damages, scientific uncertainty must be resolved in favor of prevention.
The conditions which facilitate the development of honor of culture are weak central government and lack of police.
In a culture of honour, a person (often a man) feels obligated to uphold his or her honour by retaliating violently against threats, insults, and other offences. Such cultures emerge in anarchic settings without a centralised institution (such as the state) capable of providing citizens with adequate safety.
Honor-based cultures can differ in many ways. Some societies place a strong emphasis on female matters, whereas others do not. While some cultures strongly value kindness and courtesy toward outsiders, others aggressively promote aggression toward them.
to learn more about honor culture here
brainly.com/question/17010954
#SPJ4
Answer: It produces inefficient economic results under certain conditions
Explanation: The above situation is known as the paradox of voting,which tries to show that the cost of voting will always be higher than the result obtained from the voting process.This is because Majority voting undermines the importance of an individual voter. This issue was first highlighted in 1793 by Nicolas de Condorcet,where noted that in a single stage election the influence of a single voter reduces as the number of voters increase.
The paradox of voting further highlights that the expected results/outcome of a voter from an electioneering process is less than what the initial expectations.
